August 13, 5:00 pm EST
We have a currency devaluation in Turkey that is shaking up markets. Let’s talk about what’s happening and why (if at all) it matters for the big picture outlook.
First, here’s a look at the Turkish lira chart (orange line moving up means a stronger U.S. dollar, weaker lira)…
|
Now, the problems in Turkey aren’t new. The country is economically fragile. But the collapse in the currency probably has more to do with its leadership – and the erosion of democracy in Turkey.
There are a lot of people comparing Turkey’s currency crisis to the Thai Baht devaluation in 1997 — which ultimately ignited a currency crisis in Asia, which culminated in a sovereign default in Russia. That’s the fear: a currency crisis turning into a contagion of sovereign debt defaults.
But Thailand was about economic policy – specifically, the Thai currency policy. Speculators attacked to close the valuation gap between the central bank managed currency and its economy.
This Turkey issue looks more like the collapse in the Russian Ruble in late 2014. That was geopolitically driven. Back in 2014, Putin was forcing his way into Ukraine – an affront to the Western world. This was viewed as a proxy war against the West. That led to capital flight out of Russia and speculative attack on the currency.
With this chart on the Ruble (the orange line going up means a stronger dollar and weaker ruble), Russia was quickly made vulnerable and on a sovereign debt default watch.
|
But like Turkey, the contagion risk was driven by Russia’s foreign currency denominated debt (primarily euro denominated debt owed to European banks).
With that said, the world wasn’t “normal” in 2014, nor is it now. Remember, the European Central Bank remains in quantitative easing mode. That means, we should expect central bank (or policy) intervention (if needed) to quell any shock risks that could come from European bank exposure to Turkish debt. So the ECB’s “ready to act” commitment of the post-financial crisis era should calm fears of contagion.
As for Turkey, the crippling effects of the currency attack should put pressure on the freshly re-elected Ergodan (i.e. should make him vulnerable to an uprising).
If you haven’t joined the Billionaire’s Portfolio, where you can look over my shoulder and follow my hand selected 20-stock portfolio of the best billionaire owned and influenced stocks, you can join me here.
|
January 12, 2017, 3:00pm EST
Jobs, jobs everywhere there’s jobs. The President-elect yesterday said he will be the “greatest job creator God ever created.”
Since December, when the President-elect announced that Carrier, an air conditioner manufacturer in Michigan, would keep 1,000 jobs in the U.S. instead of moving them to Mexico, other companies have been lining up to announce big, bold hiring plans.
It was immediately clear that Carrier won priceless exposure and good-will. From that point, the Japanese billionaire Masayoshi Son took a visit to Trump Tower and followed with an announcement that his Softbank technology holdings company would invest $50 billion in U.S. businesses and create 50,000 new jobs. Softbank owns more than 80% of Sprint, and Sprint has followed with an announcement of 5,000 jobs to come.
Alibaba’s founder Jack Ma visited Trump Tower yesterday and left saying he would create 1 million jobs in the U.S.
Amazon, who’s CEO Jeff Bezos had a visit to Trump Tower last month, said today they plan to add 100k jobs.
Not to be outdone, Taco Bell (part of YUM Brands), said today it would add 1.6 million jobs in the U.S. Does this mean Taco Bell is about to go on a massive expansion increasing their store count by 5x — putting a Taco Bell on every corner in America?
Or, is this all just a public relations ploy? Are they all hoping to gain favor with the administration? Yes and yes. But it’s also all self-reinforcing. A better outlook for jobs is driving confidence. Confidence can drive a better outlook for jobs. More employed, more confident consumers can drive economic growth. And better growth drives more jobs.
Now, all of this said, the headline unemployment number is already down to 4.7% (near what is considered “normal”). The number that measures underemployed and those that have stopped looking is down to 9.2%. It’s much higher than the headline rate, but relative to history, it’s returning close to normal levels too. With the prospects of hotter growth coming, and new job creation, we could be headed for a very tight labor market. What does that mean? Higher wages are coming, to finally begin making up for two decades of wage stagnation.
For help building a high potential portfolio, follow me in our Billionaire’s Portfolio, where you look over my shoulder as I follow the world’s best investors into their best stocks. Our portfolio more than doubled the return of the S&P 500 in 2016. You can join me here and get positioned for a big 2017.
December 13, 2016, 4:00pm EST
Last week we talked about how a visit to Trump Tower was becoming a good predictor of a success for your stock.
Goldman continues to build representation in the Trump administration with the latest addition, Gary Cohn (current COO and President of Goldman Sachs) as the National Economic Council Director. And hedge funder Anthony Scaramucci, a Goldman Sachs alum and current member of the Trump transition team, is rumored to be in the running for a role in the administration. Goldman’s stock continues to rise, as the best performer in the Dow Jones Industrial average since Election Day (up 31%).
And remember, we talked about the visit last week of Masayoshi Son, the Japanese billionaire and majority stake holder in Sprint. Sprint is up 32% since election day.
So now we have the latest, and one of the most important cabinet appointments, Rex Tillerson, who will be Secretary of State. He’s the Chairman and CEO of Exxon Mobil, the biggest energy company in the country and one of the largest publicly traded companies. Exxon was up 2% today, and is up 9% since the election — better than the broader market, but not quite as good as the stocks of some other Trump Tower visitors.
This is a very interesting pick. Given that the President-elect has openly talked about using oil as an economic weapon (on Iraq… “we should have taken the oil”). We now have one of the world’s most respected experts in oil, and in negotiating around oil, charged with stabilizing the middle east and relations with Russia (to name a few). And given that the hot spot of global instability surrounds countries (or regimes) that are highly dependendent on oil revenue (funded by oil revenue), we have a guy that could credibly utilize leverage emerging U.S. supply, and global demand of the developed world, as a bargaining chip. His appointment/presence may also end up yielding a stable oil price environment going forward (tempering the manipulation of price extremes by OPEC).
Follow me and look over my shoulder as I follow the world’s best investors into their best stocks. Our portfolio is up more than 27% this year. You can join me here and get positioned for a big 2017.
May 27, 2016, 11:40am EST
As we head into the Memorial Day weekend, we want to talk today about the G7 meeting that took place this week Japan, and how these meetings tend to effect financial markets (namely the key barometer for global markets in this environment, U.S. stocks). It’s a big effect.
If we look back at the past seven annual meetings of world leaders, there is clearly a direct correlation between their messaging and the resulting performance of stocks.
For context, we’re talking about a period, from 2009-present, that has been driven by intervention and careful confidence massaging by global policymakers. So it shouldn’t be surprising that coming out of these meetings, post-Lehman, things happen.
Let’s take a look at the chart of the S&P 500 and highlight the spots where a G7 meeting wrapped up (note: this was actually the G8 prior to 2014, when Russia was ousted from the group).
Source: Reuters, Billionaire’s Portfolio
If you bought stocks following the meeting in Italy, in 2009, you’ve made a lot of money. The next year, in Canada, same result. Of course, the world was in very bad shape at the time, and the messaging from both meetings was unambiguously focused on the economy, restoring stability and growth.
By May of 2011, the message was that the recovery was becoming “self sustaining” (a positive tone). Stocks didn’t push higher, and then fell back later in the year when the European debt crisis spread to Italy, Spain and France.
In 2012, the meeting was hosted in the Washington D.C. The European debt crisis was at peak crisis. Greece exiting the euro was on the table and it was stoking fear that Italy and Spain were next to crumble and destroy the European Monetary Union. The first line of the communiqué was about Europe and the need for economic stimulus. Stocks went higher and two months later, ECB head Mario Draghi further fueled stocks by stepping in and averting disaster in Europe by saying they would do “whatever it takes” to save the euro.
In 2013, G7 leaders, plus Russia met in the UK. The second statement in the 33 page communiqué focused on economic uncertainty and promoting growth and jobs. Stocks went higher.
In 2014, the meeting was hosted by the European Union. Russia had been ousted earlier in the year from the G8 for break of international law for its actions in Ukraine. The primary focus was on Russia and promoting freedom and democracy. The tone on the economy was somewhat upbeat. Stocks went up for a few weeks and then ultimately fell back later in the year in a sharp correction/then sharp recovery.
In 2015, Germany hosted. The communiqué led with a focus on the refugee crisis. Stocks followed a similar path to 2014.
Finally, today the 2016 meetings concluded in Japan. The focus was on the economy. “Global growth remains moderate and below potential, while risks of weak growth persist.” And they discuss rising geo-political conflicts as a further burden on the global economy.
So if we look back at these meetings, clearly there is a G7 (G8) effect. If the headline focus is the economy, it tends to be very good for stocks.
Don’t Miss Out On This Stock
In our Billionaire’s Portfolio we followed the number one performing hedge fund on the planet into a stock that has the potential to triple by the end of next month.
This fund returned an incredible 52% last year, while the S&P 500 was flat. And since 1999, they’ve done 40% a year. And they’ve done it without one losing year. For perspective, that takes every $100,000 to $30 million.
We want you on board. To find out the name of this hedge fund, the stock we followed them into, and the catalyst that could cause the stock to triple by the end of the month, click here and join us in our Billionaire’s Portfolio.
We make investing easy. We follow the guys with the power and the influence to control their own destiny – and a record of unmatchable success. And you come along for the ride.
We look forward to welcoming you aboard!
Regards,
Bryan
May 25, 2016, 3:30pm EST
We charted very closely the risks of the oil price bust. We thought central banks would step in and remove the risk. They did. From there, we thought stocks would track the path of oil. As long as oil continued higher, stocks would follow and slowly global sentiment would mend. It’s happened.
When oil sustained above $40, we turned focus to the extremely negative sentiment that was weighing on markets and economies. But given the extreme views on the world, we thought things were set up for positive surprises. We said this surprise element creates opportunities for asymmetric outcomes (bad is priced-in, good … not at all). That sets up for the potential of “good times” ahead for both markets and broader sentiment.
Fast forward: Earnings expectations were ratcheted down and broadly surprised on the positive side. Global economic data has been ratcheted down and is positively surprising. It’s happening in Germany, which is a very important indicator for a bottoming of the euro zone economy. If the threat of further spiral in Europe has lifted, that’s a huge catalyst for global sentiment. When global sentiment has officially moved out of the doom and gloom camp and back to optimism the horse will have already had plenty of steps out of the barn. And we think we are seeing it reflected in stocks, especially small caps.
With this backdrop, we think everyone could benefit by having a healthy dose of “fear of missing out.” Stock returns tend to be lumpy over the long run. When we you wait to buy strength, you miss out on A LOT of the punch that contributes to the long run return for stocks.
Consider what we said on February 11th (stocks bottomed that day and are up 16% since): “We often hear interviews of money managers during periods like this, and the question is asked “are you getting defensive?”
That’s the exact opposite of what they should be asking. When stocks are up 15–20%, and acknowledging that the long–run average return for stocks is 8%, that’s the time to play Defense. When stocks are down 15–20%, that’s the time to play Offense.
The reality is most investors should see declines in the U.S. stock market as an exciting opportunity. The best investors in the world do. The same can be said for average investors.
Here’s why: Most average investors in stocks are NOT leveraged. And with that, they should have no concern about stock market declines, other than saying to themselves, “what a gift,” and asking themselves these questions: “Do I have cash I can put to work at these cheaper prices?” And, “where should I put that cash to work?”
As Warren Buffett says, bad news is an investor’s best friend. And as his billionaire counterpart says, and head of the biggest hedge fund in the world, ‘stocks go up over time.’ With these two basic, plain-spoken, tenets you should buy dips and look for value.
Broader stocks have just gone positive for the year. Small caps are still down small. Remember, when the macro fog cleared in 2010, small caps went on a tear, from down 6% through the first seven months of the year, to finish UP 27%. Don’t miss out!
Don’t Miss Out On This Stock
In our Billionaire’s Portfolio we followed the number one performing hedge fund on the planet into a stock that has the potential to triple by the end of the month.
This fund returned an incredible 52% last year, while the S&P 500 was flat. And since 1999, they’ve done 40% a year. And they’ve done it without one losing year. For perspective, that takes every $100,000 to $30 million.
We want you on board. To find out the name of this hedge fund, the stock we followed them into, and the catalyst that could cause the stock to triple by the end of the month, click here and join us in our Billionaire’s Portfolio.
We make investing easy. We follow the guys with the power and the influence to control their own destiny – and a record of unmatchable success. And you come along for the ride.
We look forward to welcoming you aboard!
