Since Friday of last week, there have been a lot of reports on the spike in the VIX. Today I want to talk about the VIX and the performance of major benchmark markets over the past week.
In a world where stability is king, central bankers have been very sensitive to swings in key financial markets, with the idea that confidence and the perception of stability can quickly become unhinged by market moves. When that happens, it becomes a big, viable threat to the global economic recovery and outlook. It can certainly send policy intentions off of the rails (as we’ve seen happen time and time again with the Fed).
Should they be worried?
With the above said, some might think the biggest threat to a Fed move in September (or December) isn’t economic data, but this chart.
Sources: Reuters, Forbes Billionaire’s Portfolio
First, what is the VIX? The VIX is an index that tracks the implied volatility of the S&P 500 index. What is implied volatility? It’s not actual volatility as might be measured by the dispersion of data from is mean.
Implied vol has more to do with the level of certainty that market makers have or don’t have about the future. When big money managers come calling for an option to hedge against potential downside in stocks, a market maker on the floor in Chicago at the CME prices the option with some objective inputs. And the variable input is implied volatility. When uncertainty is rising, the implied volatility value includes some premium over actual volatility. In short, if you’re a market maker and you think there is rising risk for a (as an example) a sharp decline in stocks, you will charge the buyer of that protection more, just as an insurance company would charge a client more for a homeowners policy in an area more included to see hurricanes.
So with that in mind, the implied vol market for the S&P 500 had been very subdued for the past 45 days or so, quickly falling back to complacency levels following the Brexit fears of late June. But since Friday, when market interest rates on government bonds spiked sharply (in the U.S., German, Japan), the VIX spiked from 12 to 20 (a more than 60% move).
That indicates a couple of things: 1) Stock investors were spooked by the move in rates and immediately looked for some downside protection, and 2) market makers aren’t quite as complacent as they appeared when the VIX was muddling along at low levels. They are quick to raise the insurance premium, highly spooked by the risk of a sharp decline in stocks.
But it looks like this recent spike might have more to do with market maker community that is psychologically damaged by the abrupt market moves of the past eight years. Gold is down since Friday – giving the opposite message of what the VIX is giving us about perceived uncertainty (people smell fear, they buy gold). And the S&P 500 has only lost 1.3% from its peak last Friday.
We’ve talked about the recent public portfolio disclosures that have made in recent days by the world’s biggest investors.
And as we’ve discussed, the 13F filings only offer value to the extent that there is some skilled analysis applied. Loads of managers file 13Fs every quarter. And the difference in manager talent, strategies, portfolio sizes … run the gamut.
Through our research of over 15 years, among the most predictive factors in these filings is the presence of high conviction positions. To put it simply, the bigger the position relative to the size of their portfolio, the better. Concentrated positions show conviction. Conviction tends to result in a higher probability of success, especially when the investor has a controlling stake and is influencing (or seeking to influence) management. At that stage, these positions will show up first, before the quarterly 13F filing, in more timely filings called a 13D (or 13G) filings.
Here’s a look at a specific case that fits that profile, with some detail on why it matters.
If we look across high conviction positions among the recent 13F filings, among the highest, we find Carmike Cinemas (symbol CKEC). Mittleman Brothers, a $410 million hedge fund and value investment advisor, runs a concentrated portfolio, and owns 9.6% of the CKEC.
The stake represents (as of the most recent 13F filing) more than 31% of its long U.S. equity portfolio (more than 18% of its overall portfolio). That’s a huge stake.
After fees the Mittleman Brothers have returned 17% annualized since inception (2003). So we have a manager that has doubled the S&P 500 over the 14 years, runs a concentrated portfolio, and has an ultra-high conviction stock in CKEC. And in this particular case, they have the ability to influence the outcome in CKEC.
The fund filed a 13D on Carmike back in March, which means they intended to influence management. Mittleman has since been trying to block a sale of Carmike to AMC Entertainment Holdings for a value they deem “unacceptably low.”
At the time of the first takeover offer, the stock traded at just around $25 (so a $30 takeout would be a 20% premium). The stock now trades at $31. But based on industry multiples, Mittleman argues the company should be sold for no less than $40, and as much as $47. The bid has since been raised, but remains at levels Mittleman has deemed unacceptable.
The moral of the story: As we know, management’s mandate in public companies is to maximize shareholder value, but unfortunately it doesn’t always happen (most of the time, only after their interests are maximized). That’s why siding with influential shareholders that are fighting to maximize your return on investment is critical. In the case of Carmike, you have management that is willing to give away the company for as little as 70 cents on the dollar (according to view of one of its biggest shareholders).
In our Billionaire’s Portfolio, we’re positioned in deep value stocks that have the potential to do multiples of the broader market—all stocks that are owned and influenced by the world’s smartest and most powerful billionaire investors. Join us today and get yourself in line with our portfolio. You can join here.
Yesterday was the deadline for all big investors to submit, to the SEC, a public snapshot of their portfolios for the quarter ended June 30th.
On that note, as we’ve discussed, this information is covered hot and heavy by the media. You often see headlines like these (these are actual headlines from yesterday): “Activist hedge fund ValueAct takes about 2 percent stake in Morgan Stanley” or “George Soros sells off Apple stake during the second quarter.”
On the above stories, if you own Morgan Stanley should you feel good about it? Conversely, if you own Apple, should you be worried? The heavy coverage of the topic both online and on television implies “yes” to both, which likely gets the average investor stirring. But there’s never context given as to whether or not the information is meaningful, and there’s never evidence given as to what the results tend to be for those that follow. The reason is, it requires a lot of hard work, experience, ingenuity and proprietary research to draw any conclusions from the information.
Still, it’s safe to assume the UK event had considerable influence on the holdings of the world’s biggest investors. Global markets swung violently on the news back in June. Remember, between June 23rd and June 27th, the S&P 500 fell as much as 5.7%. It made it all back the subsequent four days.
So given the timing of the portfolio snapshot with the Brexit fears, let’s talk about Apple, the most widely held stock in the world and the largest constituent in the market cap weighted S&P 500. The headlines were scrolling fast and furious on Apple yesterday, following the filings from billionaire investors David Einhorn, George Soros and Chase Coleman – all of which sold Apple shares in the quarter. Now, it’s important to understand that these funds can trade Apple with virtual anonymity between quarters. The stock is too large for anyone one investor to take a 5% “activist” stake, which would trigger the requirement of a 13D filing with the SEC, which would require updated filings (or amendments) within 10 days of any change in the position size (sell one share, you have to report it).
On that note, let’s start some perspective on Einhorn’s Apple stake: Going into the second quarter Einhorn’s biggest position, by far, was Apple. He had 15% of his fund in the stock (a huge position). It would only make since that he would trim the position and neutralize some risk into an uncertain macro event. In fact, in his second quarter letter, Einhorn brags that they have done a good job of “trading” Apple (i.e. managing the downside). Still, as of the end of Q2, Apple was a very large position, at 12% of his fund.
What about the tech investing genius billionaire Chase Coleman? Coleman had 9% of his $7 billion fund (long public equities) in Apple going into the second quarter. By the end, he had cut it by 75%. Again, playing defense into Brexit. Apple stock is 16% higher than it traded on June 30. Coleman may very well have put the full position back on since the June 30 snapshot (likely).
George Soros? First, we should note that Soros is the world’s best global macro investor. He’s an agile investor that will load up on a theme and just as quickly reverse course and position for another probable outcome. For a career, Soros’ bread has been buttered betting on the unexpected outcome. That’s where the big wins come. Brexit was unexpected, thus his trimming of Apple, the stock with the biggest contribution to his view on a slide in the S&P 500.
And then we have arguably the greatest investor of all-time, Warren Buffett. While others ran from Apple, Buffett increased his stake by more than 55%. Why? Buffett has made his living for more than 50 years buying good companies when everyone else is selling. As he says, “be greedy when others are fearful.”
That’s a sliver of perspective on the popular 13F filings of the past few days. As I said yesterday, the presence of a big investor in a stock is rarely valuable information. Only a small percentage of those reporting investors have the powerful combination of size, influence and portfolio concentration to make their presence alone a potential catalyst for change in a company/and a repricing of the stock.
Follow The Lead Of Great Investors Like Warren Buffett In Our Billionaire’s Portfolio
In our Billionaire’s Portfolio, we’re positioned in deep value stocks that have the potential to do multiples of the broader market—all stocks that are owned and influenced by the world’s smartest and most powerful billionaire investors. Join us today and get yourself in line with our portfolio. You can join here.
We charted very closely the risks of the oil price bust. We thought central banks would step in and remove the risk. They did. From there, we thought stocks would track the path of oil. As long as oil continued higher, stocks would follow and slowly global sentiment would mend. It’s happened.
When oil sustained above $40, we turned focus to the extremely negative sentiment that was weighing on markets and economies. But given the extreme views on the world, we thought things were set up for positive surprises. We said this surprise element creates opportunities for asymmetric outcomes (bad is priced-in, good … not at all). That sets up for the potential of “good times” ahead for both markets and broader sentiment.
Fast forward: Earnings expectations were ratcheted down and broadly surprised on the positive side. Global economic data has been ratcheted down and is positively surprising. It’s happening in Germany, which is a very important indicator for a bottoming of the euro zone economy. If the threat of further spiral in Europe has lifted, that’s a huge catalyst for global sentiment. When global sentiment has officially moved out of the doom and gloom camp and back to optimism the horse will have already had plenty of steps out of the barn. And we think we are seeing it reflected in stocks, especially small caps.
With this backdrop, we think everyone could benefit by having a healthy dose of “fear of missing out.” Stock returns tend to be lumpy over the long run. When we you wait to buy strength, you miss out on A LOT of the punch that contributes to the long run return for stocks.
Consider what we said on February 11th (stocks bottomed that day and are up 16% since): “We often hear interviews of money managers during periods like this, and the question is asked “are you getting defensive?”
That’s the exact opposite of what they should be asking. When stocks areup 15–20%, and acknowledging that the long–run average return for stocksis 8%, that’s the time to play Defense. When stocks are down 15–20%, that’s the time to play Offense.
The reality is most investors should see declines in the U.S. stock market as an exciting opportunity. The best investors in the world do. The same can be said for average investors.
Here’s why: Most average investors in stocks are NOT leveraged. And with that, they should have no concern about stock market declines, other than saying to themselves, “what a gift,” and asking themselves these questions: “Do I have cash I can put to work at these cheaper prices?” And, “where should I put that cash to work?”
As Warren Buffett says, bad news is an investor’s best friend. And as his billionaire counterpart says, and head of the biggest hedge fund in the world, ‘stocks go up over time.’ With these two basic, plain-spoken, tenets you should buy dips and look for value.
Broader stocks have just gone positive for the year. Small caps are still down small. Remember, when the macro fog cleared in 2010, small caps went on a tear, from down 6% through the first seven months of the year, to finish UP 27%. Don’t miss out!
Don’t Miss Out On This Stock
In our Billionaire’s Portfolio we followed the number one performing hedge fund on the planet into a stock that has the potential to triple by the end of the month.
This fund returned an incredible 52% last year, while the S&P 500 was flat. And since 1999, they’ve done 40% a year. And they’ve done it without one losing year. For perspective, that takes every $100,000 to $30 million.
We want you on board. To find out the name of this hedge fund, the stock we followed them into, and the catalyst that could cause the stock to triple by the end of the month, click here and join us in our Billionaire’s Portfolio.
We make investing easy. We follow the guys with the power and the influence to control their own destiny – and a record of unmatchable success. And you come along for the ride.
Last week we talked about Warren Buffett’s new stake in Apple. Today we want to talk about the investor that recently sold Apple: Carl Icahn.
In a world where information is abundant, markets are priced quite efficiently. The way a stock re-prices is through CHANGE.
And that’s precisely what the influential investors that we follow in our Billionaire’s Portfolio specialize in. And that’s why they have such a tremendous record in posting consistent superior returns – and, in turn, building tremendous wealth for themselves and their investors.
No one has done a better job at creating change for shareholders than Carl Icahn – certainly not over the span of the past three decades. That’s why we have 20% of our Billionaires Portfolio in stocks owned and controlled by Icahn.
We consider Icahn the god-father of activism. Very early on, Icahn found that, among all of the complications people like to add to investing, there is a very simple opportunity to take advantage and capitalize on the simplicities that we all know about human nature.
In his words, “some people get rich studying artificial intelligence. Me, I make money studying natural stupidity.”
I’ll interpret that remark with these three simple points: 1) People will take advantage of opportunities to satisfy their own self-interests. 2) People will find ways to justify their self-serving actions. 3) People will be greedy.
Add this human nature to a concoction called the public equity markets, and you find, among many things, a witch’s brew of bad management teams at publicly traded companies.
To most investors, identifying a company that’s run poorly is a red flag – something to stay away from.
For Icahn, it’s opportunity. It’s blood in the water. Why? Because it presents the opportunity for CHANGE. And when you get change, you have a chance to make a lot of money as the stock re-prices to reflect that change.
Icahn has done this over and over throughout his long career. That’s why he has been able to compound money at nearly 30% a year for almost 50-years. That’s the greatest long-term investment track record in history (as far as we know). One thousand dollars with Icahn when he started has gone to$275 million.
Even at the age of 80, Icahn has been as vocal and as influential as ever. He influenced Apple to a near double by encouraging Apple to use their treasure chest of cash to buy back stock. Cash sitting on a balance sheet idle does nothing for shareholders. Share buybacks create shareholder value.
That’s the name of the game. Despite what some CEOs may think, that is precisely why they have been employed, to create shareholder value. And that is often the change that has to take place (the CEO or the mindset of leadership).
Icahn’s continued investing success can be attributed to one important talent: He’s a change-maker. When we follow him, we can be assured that he has a plan for change and that he will fight to make it happen. Plus, when we follow Icahn, we get an added bonus that few, if any, other big time investors summon: Because of his great success, his campaigns tend to attract other influential investors to join in – stacking the odds even more favorably for shareholders.
We’ll talk more about the “Icahn effect” tomorrow.
Don’t Miss Out On This Stock
In our Billionaire’s Portfolio we followed the number one performing hedge fund on the planet into a stock that has the potential to triple by the end of the month.
This fund returned an incredible 52% last year, while the S&P 500 was flat. And since 1999, they’ve done 40% a year. And they’ve done it without one losing year. For perspective, that takes every $100,000 to $30 million.
We want you on board. To find out the name of this hedge fund, the stock we followed them into, and the catalyst that could cause the stock to triple by the end of the month, click here and join us in our Billionaire’s Portfolio.
We make investing easy. We follow the guys with the power and the influence to control their own destiny – and a record of unmatchable success. And you come along for the ride.
As we’ve discussed over the past few months, markets can be wrong—sometimes very wrong.
On that note, consider that the yield on the U.S. ten–year Treasury was trading closer to 2.30% after the Fed’s first rate hike last December—the first hike in nearly ten years and the symbolic move away from the emergency zero interest rate policy. The ten–year yield has, incredulously, traded as low as 1.53% since. One end of that spectrum is wrong, very wrong.
Remember, as we headed into the last Fed meeting, the ten–year yield was trading just shy of 2% (after a wild ride down from the December hike date). And the communication to that point from the Fed was to expect FOUR rate hikes in 2016.
Of course, in the face of another global economic crisis threat, which was driven by the oil price bust, the Fed did their part and backed off of that forecast—taking two of those hikes off of the table. Still, yields under 2% with even two hikes projected seemed mispriced.
So following a dramatic 85% bounce in oil prices and the threat of cheap oil now behind us (seemingly), as of yesterday afternoon yields still stood around just 1.79%. That’s more than a 1/2 percentage point lower than the levels immediately following the December hike. And that’s AFTER two voting Fed members just said on Tuesday that they should go two or threetimes this year. So with global risks abating, the Fed is beginning to walk back up expectations for Fed hikes.
Confirming that, as of yesterday afternoon, the minutes from the most recent Fed meeting have been disclosed, which now indicate that a June hike is likely assuming things continue along the current path (i.e. no global shock risks emerge).
Still, the yield on the ten–year Treasury is just 1.84%, 5 basis points higher than it was yesterday morning, prior to the Fed minutes.
Why?
The bet is that the Fed is making a mistake raising rates (at all). But at these levels for the ten–year yield, it’s a very asymmetric bet. The downside for yields here is very limited (short of a global apocalypse), the upside is very big. That makes betting on lower yields a very dangerous one, if not a dumb one. When people are positioned the wrong way in asymmetric trades, the adverse moves tend to be violent. I wouldn’t be surprised to see 2.50% on the U.S. ten–year Treasury by the year end.
Don’t Miss Out On This Stock
In our Billionaire’s Portfolio we followed the number one performing hedge fund on the planet into a stock that has the potential to triple by the end of the month.
This fund returned an incredible 52% last year, while the S&P 500 was flat. And since 1999, they’ve done 40% a year. And they’ve done it without one losing year. For perspective, that takes every $100,000 to $30 million.
We want you on board. To find out the name of this hedge fund, the stock we followed them into, and the catalyst that could cause the stock to triple by the end of the month, click here and join us in our Billionaires Portfolio.
We make investing easy. We follow the guys with the power and the influence to control their own destiny – and a record of unmatchable success. And you come along for the ride.
In our Billionaire’s Portfolio we followed the number one performing hedge fund on the planet into a stock that has the potential to triple by the end of the month.
This fund returned an incredible 52% last year, while the S&P 500 was flat. And since 1999, they’ve done 40% a year. And they’ve done it without one losing year. For perspective, that takes every $100,000 to $30 million.
We want you on board. To find out the name of this hedge fund, the stock we followed them into, and the catalyst that could cause the stock to triple by the end of the month, click here and join us in our Billionaires Portfolio.
We make investing easy. We follow the guys with the power and the influence to control their own destiny – and a record of unmatchable success. And you come along for the ride.
Intervention has been the common theme we’ve discussed for the better part of the past two months. And this week, that theme is heating up.
We’ve explained why oil at $30 has posed a threat to the global financial system and global economy. And we explained the parallels of the systemically threatening (current) oil price bust and the 2007-2008 housing bust. But we also noted the key differences, and why and how this “cheap oil” problem could be easily solved, unlike the housing bust.
If you are managing more than $100 million, you are required to report to your holdings to the SEC within 45 days of the end of the quarter. And tonight we began to see those disclosures hit, for a peek into the activities of the world’s best billionaire hedge fund managers.
Now, 13-F filings provide a ton of information, but you have to know exactly what to look for to make them useful.
With that being said, here is what caught my eye tonight from the quarterly holdings of the world’s best billionaire hedge fund managers.
Apple ($AAPL)
Every top hedge fund seemed to either buy or increase their position in Apple (AAPL), including billionaire Leon Cooperman. Cooperman initiated a brand new position in the stock, buying more than 1 million shares in Apple last quarter (before it split). We said almost two months ago on this blog that Apple’s 7-for-1 stock split in June would be a positive catalyst to push the stock higher. In an instant, it would make the most widely held stock in the world affordable again for the retail investor. Apple is up almost 25% over since announcing the split, and is currently trading near a significant psychological round number of $100.
Expect a big fuss to be made about the activity in Apple shown in these filings, but this one looks old and tired. Apple was a good buy after its June stock split and was an even better buy when I called the bottom in the stock more than a year ago (see it here). And that was well before Carl Icahn or any major hedge fund owned the stock. Bottom line, I would not buy Apple here and would actually sell it when it hits $100.
Facebook ($FB)
The world’s best-performing hedge fund manager, David Tepper, added to his position in Facebook, but again Facebook had a nice run last quarter and is now up more than 40%. So piggybacking Tepper on Facebbook (which usually is a can’t-miss trade) today is again a stale trade. I don’t like it.
Zynga ($ZNGA)
Now here is a trade that could be compelling. Patrick McCormack, a Tiger Cub and head of Tiger Consumer Management, initiated a new position in Zynga last quarter at prices much higher than what Zynga is selling for today. By my estimates, Tiger Consumer purchased its new 18 million share stake in Zynga at $4, or 28% above its current price.
After selling off after a bad earnings report, the stock looks like it has found support and a double bottom at the $2.85 area. So Zynga could be a good trade to piggyback from Tiger Consumer.
Warren Buffett and Verizon ($VZ)
Buffett sold his entire position in Starz ($STRZA) and Conoco Phillips ($COP), and initiated a new $365 million position in Charter Comunications (CHTR).
Plus, as we predicted in February in our Forbes piece, he increased his position in Verizon. He now owns more than $700 million dollars worth of Verizon Stock ($VZ) after adding an additional 4 million shares.
The fact that Buffett increased an already huge stake in Verizon, and the stock has been flat over the past four months, makes VZ a very compelling trade to piggyback.
Billionaire Hedge Fund Manager John Paulson, Gold and Biotech
John Paulson initiated and added to positions that were heavily weighted in the biotech and healthcare sectors. Paulson initiated new positions in Allergan ($AGN) and Questcor Pharmaceuticals ($QCOR). And he added to his stake in Vanda Pharmaceuticals (a stock we owned almost two years ago in our Billionaire’s Portfolio service, at $4.50).
As for his gold position, no change. But he doubled his position in Dollar General (DG), and this could be the trade to piggyback. The stock has traded flat over the past four months, it’s rumored to be a merger or takeover candidate, and we have a big influential investor that has upped his stake, dramatically. That’s a good formula for success.
Tiger Global, Viking Global and Netflix ($NFLX)
Tiger Global initiated a nearly $200 million dollar position in Netflix (NFLX), a savvy move given Netflix is up almost 40% over the past four months. Billionaire Andreas Halvorsen of Viking Global also initiated a new position in Netflix, buying almost $600 million worth of the stock last quarter.
Billionaire Dan Loeb of Third Point
Billionaire Dan Loeb of Third point purchased new positions in Rackspace (RAX), IAC/Interactive Corp (IACI), and Ally Financial (ALLY). Third Point owns almost 10% of Ally, which recently started trading in April as a spinoff. Of all these new positions to piggyback, I like Rackspace (RAX) the best. Rackspace is down almost 20% year-to-date and has been rumored to be a takeover candidate.
Bill Ackman and Pershing Square
Ackman trimmed most of his real estate holdings, including Home Properties ($HME) and Apartment Investment and Manangement ($AIV), perhaps signaling that he believes REITs and real estate stocks have topped out. Ackman also increased his already large stake in Allergan ($AGN), showing that many of the top billionaire hedge fund managers are still very bullish on healthcare-biotech stocks, as well as M&A. John Paulson also took a large position in Allergan (AGN), a healthcare stock that is in the process of being acquired.
Billionaire Seth Klarman of Baupost Group
Seth Klarman is probably one of the worst hedge fund managers to piggyback. He prefers to hold a significant amount of cash and prefers illiquid, private investments to pubic ones. Klarman did purchase a new stake in EBAY (EBAY) and Theravanace Biopharma (TBPH), a stock that recently went public and is up more than 30% over the past three months. Klarman sold his entire stake in BP Plc (BP).
Here are the takeaways from the Q2 filings of the world’s best billionaire hedge funds: First, the best hedge fund managers are still bullish on technology, healthcare and biotech stocks, but are turning bearish on energy stocks.
The top billionaire hedge funds took advantage of the mini crash in technology stocks during the second quarter to add to or initiate positions in some of the best names in technology: Apple, Facebook and Netflix. This bet paid off huge for many of these managers, as all three of these stocks greatly outperformed the S&P 500 over the past few months.
Lastly, many of these investors own the same stocks, the most popular being Family Dollar, Dollar General, EBAY and Apple.
