The market is typically pretty good at pricing in what is known. And it has been pretty clear that Trump has seen trade imbalances as a key piece of his structural reform plan. And the strategy on correcting those imbalances has been to fight trade barriers with trade barriers.
While it has created plenty of fodder for political and economic debates, the markets seem to like it.
As we’ve discussed, any movement on trade, from a U.S. perspective, is success. He has said as much with this statement on China:
Given the position of U.S. stocks (at or near record highs) relative to global trading partner stock markets (largely, negative on the year), the market seems to be fairly comfortably betting that movement will occur, given the position of strength from which Trump is negotiating (i.e. the biggest and most powerful economy behind him).
Now, this is the effort to level the playing field internationally. We’ve also talked about the ‘domestic’ leveling of the playing field on the Trump agenda. And that has everything to do with the tech giants. And it has most to do with Amazon.
With that, we’ve talked about the case for breaking up Amazon. As I’ve said
“At 161 times earnings, the market seems to be betting on the Amazon monopoly being left to corner all of the world’s industries. That’s a bad bet. Much like China undercut the competition on price and cornered the world’s export market, Amazon has undercut the retail industry on price, and cornered the world’s retail business. That tipping point (on retail) has well passed. And as sales growth accelerates for Amazon, so does the speed at which competition is being destroyed. But Amazon is now moving aggressively into almost every industry. This company has to be/will be broken up.”
Amazon was a big loser on the day today. Why? Break-up speculation.
A Citibank internet analyst today called for the split of Amazon’s ecommerce and cloud computing business (AWS). But the analyst recommended the company split itself to avoid regulators doing it for them. That sounds like a recommendation for a pre-emptive strike in an effort to maintain the euphoric investor sentiment in the stock.
When we look back, the trillion-dollar valuation threshold in Amazon may have been curse. On September 4th, it hit a trillion dollars. And that has been the dead top.
If you haven’t joined the Billionaire’s Portfolio, where you can look over my shoulder and follow my hand selected 20-stock portfolio of the best billionaire owned and influenced stocks, you can join me here.
Yesterday we talked about the case for breaking up Amazon, on the day it crossed the trillion-dollar valuation threshold. Today the stock was down 2%.
Also today, Facebook and Twitter executives visited Capitol Hill for a Congressional grilling.
If you listened to Zuckerberg’s Congressional testimony in April, and today’s grilling of Jack Dorsey (Twitter) and Sheryl Sandberg (Facebook), it’s clear that they have created monsters that they can’t manage. These tech giants have gotten too big, too powerful, and too dangerous to the economy (and society).
All have emerged and dominated, thanks in large part to regulatory advantage – operating under the guise of an “internet business.” And it all went unchecked for too long. These are monopolies in the making. But, as we know, Trump is on it.
As we discussed yesterday, Amazon has to, and will be, broken up. As for Facebook, Google, Twitter, Uber: the regulatory screws are tightening. Those businesses won’t look the same when it’s over. But it’s complicated. The higher the cost of compliance, the smaller the chances that there will ever be another Facebook or challenger. That goes for many of the tech giants.
With that in mind, regulation actually strengthens the moat for these companies.
That would argue that they may ultimately go the way of public utilities (in the case of Facebook, Google and Twitter).
If you haven’t joined the Billionaire’s Portfolio, where you can look over my shoulder and follow my hand selected 20-stock portfolio of the best billionaire owned and influenced stocks, you can join me here.
With the S&P 500 finally returning to new record highs today, fully recovering the price correction this year, let’s take a look back at the correction, and where stocks can go from here.
As I said in my January 30 note “experience tells us that markets don’t go in a straight line. And with that, we should expect to have dips along the way for this bull market. Since 1946, the S&P 500 has had a 10% decline about once a year on average. A correction here would be healthy and would set the table for hotter earnings and hotter economic growth (coming down the pike) to ultimately drive the remainder of stock returns for the year.”
Fast forward eight months, and we’ve now had a 12% correction. And we’ve since had back-to-back quarters of 20%+ earnings growth, with an economy that is finally growing at better than 3% four-quarter average annualized growth.
Meanwhile, stocks remain cheap. The 10-year yield is still under 3%. And historically, when rates are low (sub 3% is still VERY low), stocks tend to trade north of 20 times earnings. The forward P/E on stocks at the moment is just 17. If we apply a 20x multiple to $170 in forward S&O 500 earnings, we get 3,400 in the S&P. That’s 19% higher.
With that in mind, let’s also revisit my chart on the long term growth rate of the S&P 500.
In the orange line, you can see what the S&P 500 looks like growing at 8% annualized (the long-run average growth rate) from the pre-crisis peak in 2007. This is where stocks should have gone, absent the near global economic apocalypse. And you can see the actual path for stocks in the blue line.
Bottom line: Despite the nice run we’ve had in stocks, off the bottom in 2009, we still have a big gap to make up (the difference between the blue line and the orange line). This is the lost decade for stocks.
This argues for another 28% higher in stocks to fill that gap.
If you haven’t joined the Billionaire’s Portfolio, where you can look over my shoulder and follow my hand selected 20-stock portfolio of the best billionaire owned and influenced stocks, you can join me here.
As we end the week, let’s take a look at a few charts ….
We had the first look at Q2 GDP today. Here’s an updated look at the chart of the average four-quarter annualized growth rate we looked at
yesterday ….
This number will be formally revised two more times, but the “advance” number came in at 4.1%. Yesterday we talked about the prospects for the highest four-quarter annualized growth rate since 2006. We just missed it, in this first reading. But the Q1 number was revised UP to 2.2%, so adding in today’s Q2 number, and we get 3.1% four-quarter average annualized growth. Only for a moment, in 2010, was it better (at 3.15%).
I suspect we will see a bigger number in the coming Q2 revisions. And if sentiment on trade indeed bottomed out on Wednesday, with the EU concessions, we will likely have a big Q3 growth number coming.
That steadily rising trend, since the election, in the four-quarter average growth rate is a big deal. With that, I would call the above chart, the most important chart of the week…
Let’s look at the second most important chart of the week ….
I’ve been making the case that the massive Nasdaq outperformance, relative to the Dow, would begin correcting. In the chart above, you can see that it’s starting (Dow moving up, Nasdaq moving down). And it’s being led by strength in the blue chips following strong Q2 earnings, and weakness in two of the big tech giants (Netflix and Facebook) following big misses. With that, Facebook has quickly revisited levels of early May (which should give us all perspective on how aggressive this run in the tech giants has been over the past two months).
The question: Is it “peak Zuck?”
If you haven’t joined the Billionaire’s Portfolio, where you can look over my shoulder and follow my hand selected 20-stock portfolio of the best billionaire owned and influenced stocks, you can join me here.
We’ve talked about the case for a shakeout in Amazon. It was up big today on news that it would be buying a big online pharmacy.
That worked to curtail the slide in the stock (for now). But it only exacerbates the building regulatory scrutiny and the President’s wrath against Amazon’s developing monopoly and power (much of which has been garnered overtime from the unfair advantages Amazon has enjoyed from operating as an internet company).
If there’s one thing we know about Trump as a President, he’s done what he says he’s going to do. And he’s had plenty of verbal threats directed squarely at Amazon. We can only assume that he will carry out the offensive he’s been promising — against a company that has crushed industries by price wars.
On a similar note, let’s talk about China. As we’ve discussed quite a bit, China’s rapid economic ascent in the world came through currency manipulation. They held their currency down, to underprice the world on exports. And as the world stood by and watched (and bought lots of stuff from them), they became the world’s second largest economy, and the accumulated the largest war chest of foreign currency reserves.
China is to the world, as Amazon is to corporate America. And Trump is attempting to deal with them both head on.
Interestingly, China is quietly fighting back, via the currency. The go to tool in China is currency devaluation.
That’s what they’ve been doing over the past three months. And that has accelerated in just the past 10 days – they’ve devalued by almost 4% against the dollar. This is something to watch closely. A big one-off devaluation out of China would be a geopolitical cage rattling.
Join our Billionaire’s Portfolio today to get your portfolio in line with the most influential investors in the world, and hear more of my actionable political, economic and market analysis. Click here to learn more.
While the media continues to be stuck on the global jawboning about trade. We’ve been talking about the continued domestic “leveling of the playing field.”
We’ve seen the verbal and Twitter shots taken by Trump at the tech giants since he’s been in office. And the threats have slowly been materializing as policy.
Late last year, we talked about the repeal of the Net Neutrality rule. And now we have the Supreme Court ruling that subjects internet sales to state tax.
Before you know it, the tech giants (Facebook, Amazon, Netflix, Google …) may actually be held to a similar standard that their “old economy” competitors are held to. They may have to pay for real estate (i.e. bandwidth). They may be liable for content on their site, regardless of who created it. And they may be scrutinized more heavily for anti-competitive practices.
That means, the costs may go UP for these companies. And the cost may go UP for consumers. But a more balanced and stable economy and society may come with it.
So, the balance of power is shifting, just as people were becoming convinced that Amazon was taking over the world. As we’ve discussed, if the market starts pricing OUT the prospects of Amazon becoming a monopoly, then the jaws may be closing on this chart …
Join our Billionaire’s Portfolio today to get your portfolio in line with the most influential investors in the world, and hear more of my actionable political, economic and market analysis. Click here to learn more.
Last Thursday we talked about the important Supreme Court ruling, which would subject internet sales to state tax. As I said, this was another “level the playing field” step for the Trump administration. And another shot across the bow of the tech giants — the near monopolies that have destroyed industries over past decade, in large part to the regulatory advantages they’ve enjoyed relative to their old-line industry peers.
With that, on Thursday, we looked at this big reversal signal that developed in the tech-heavy Nasdaq — an ominous signal for the tech giants.
Today, we got this …
And this, in Amazon…
Meanwhile, what was UP on the day? Brick and mortar retail. Walmart was up 2%. Target was up 1%.
A lot of attention on the day, from the financial media, was given to trade threats. But this domestic “level of the playing field” is the real story.
Join our Billionaire’s Portfolio today to get your portfolio in line with the most influential investors in the world, and hear more of my actionable political, economic and market analysis. Click here to learn more.
We talked yesterday about the big influence of oil. And how the swings of the past few years have directly impacted the global economy.
Too low was threatening another global financial crisis. Now, too high is threatening to choke off the strength of the economic recovery.
Both high and low prices have been manipulated by OPEC. And we now await a decision from OPEC nations on whether or not a they will hike production to curb the level of oil prices. For a group that operates for their best interest, it doesn’t seem to be in their best interest. That decision will be announced tomorrow at a press conference.
Given the attention the Trump has given to OPEC and oil prices recently, a negative surprise (i.e. no production hike) may trigger the oil price/stock market inverse correlation trade (oil goes up, stocks go down).
On that note, we have some negative momentum going into tomorrow. Before today’s close, the Nasdaq was up 14% year-to-date. Meanwhile, the S&P 500 is up just around 3%. That’s a lopsided market.
But today we get a big outside day (key reversal signal) in the Nasdaq futures.
And the catalyst for this technical reversal setup was the Supreme Court ruling today that internet sales should be subject to state tax.
We’ve talked about the building scrutiny from the Trump administration facing the tech giants. This is another “level the playing field” step. If Amazon is pricing in the prospects of taking over everything (i.e. monopoly), this is the shot across the bow.
Join our Billionaire’s Portfolio today to get your portfolio in line with the most influential investors in the world, and hear more of my actionable political, economic and market analysis. Click here to learn more.
As we head into the long holiday weekend, let’s look at some key charts.
First, just a week ago, the U.S. interest rate market was spooking investors, as 10-year yields were hanging around 3.10%. The fear was, would 3% yields quickly turn into 4% yields, and hit economic activity.
As of today, we’re trading closer to 2.90% again, back below 3%.
But you can see, we run into this big trendline that represents this ascent in rates for 2018, which also reflects the outlook of a hotter economy, thanks to tax cuts (fiscal stimulus).
Bottom line here: The concern in interest rates is speed, not trajectory. The trajectory should continue to be UP, which is a signal that the economy is improving, and finally gaining the tracking to perform at trend, if not better than trend growth. The concern about ‘speed’ should be far less than it was a week ago.
Next, here’s a look at the S&P 500.
You can see in the chart above, we’ve broken the downtrend of this correction cycle. The longer-term trend is UP. And this bull trend started, not coincidentally, at the bottom of the oil price crash in 2016, when global central banks stepped in with measures to stem the slide in confidence.
So, we’ve had a healthy 12% correction in stocks, we’ve held the 200-day moving average, we’ve maintained the longer-term trend, and we’ve broken out of the downtrend of the correction. Small cap stocks have already returned to new record highs. And we have an economy on pace to grow at 3% this year or better, with corporate earnings expected to grow at 20% for the year. So, the second half of the year should be very good for stocks.
At the end of last week, I said “it looks like the all-clear signal has been given to stocks.”
Well, we had some more discomfort to deal with this week, but that statement probably has more validity today than it did last Friday.
With that, let’s review the events and conditions of the past two weeks, that build the case for that all-clear signal.
As of last Friday, more than half of first quarter corporate earnings were in, with record level positive surprises in both earnings and revenues (that has continued). And we got our first look at first quarter GDP, which came in at 2.3%, better than expected, and putting the economy on a 2.875% pace over the past three quarters.
What about interest rates? After all, the hot wage growth number back in February kicked the stock market correction into gear. The move in the 10-year yield above 3% last week started validating the fears that rising interest rates could quicken and maybe choke off the recovery. But last week, we also heard from the ECB and BOJ, both of which committed to QE, which serves as an anchor on global rates (i.e. keeps our rates in check).
Fast forward a few days, and we’ve now heard from the last but most important tech giant: Apple. Like the other FAANG stocks, Apple also beat on earnings and on revenues.
Still, stocks have continued to trade counter to the fundamentals. And we’ve been waiting for the bounce and recovery to pick up the pace. What else can we check off the list on this correction timeline? How about another test of the 200-day moving average, just to shake out the weak hands? We got that yesterday.
Yesterday, in the true form of a market that is bottoming, we had a sharp slide in stocks, through the 200-day moving average, and then a very aggressive bounce to finish in positive territory, and on the highs of the day. That took us to this morning, where we had another jobs report. Perhaps this makes a nice bookend to the February jobs report. This time, no big surprises. The wage growth number was tame. And stocks continued to soar, following through on yesterday’s big reversal off the 200-day moving average.
With all of this, it looks like “the all-clear signal has been given to stocks.”
