August 12, 2021

With a $1.2 trillion infrastructure package approved, let's take a look at industrial metals. 

We already know, from reading the monthly ISM reports, that manufacturing business is booming. But they are dealing with record long lead times on raw materials, due to shorages. And the price of commodity inputs are ALL going in one direction — UP. 

With the fresh demand of a massive government funded infrastructure plan coming, the supply problems will only get worse, not better.  That means higher prices. 

Let's take a look at some charts …

Above is copper, a commodity known to be an early indicator of economic turning points – among the most widely used metals.  And as we've discussed, with the global initiative behind electric vehicles, battery electric vehicles use 183 pounds of copper — 4 to 5 times the amount of copper in conventional vehicles. 

Copper is 11% off of the highs, and trading into technical support of this big trendline.  We should expect new higher, highs to come.

Here's a look at aluminum …
 

As you can see in the chart, aluminum prices have soared off of the pandemic-induced lows, but remain south of record levels. Expect new record high prices to come.

Two ways to get leveraged exposure to a continued rise in these key base metals:  Alcoa, the largest U.S. aluminum producer … and Freeport McMoran, the largest U.S. copper producer (disclosure: we own FCX in our Billionaire's Portfolio). 
 

August 11, 2021

The Democrats need 50 votes in the Senate to steamroll Biden's $3.5 trillion spending plan through Congress.

We should expect it to happen.  After all, with an aligned Congress, they've yet to get pushback on anything.  With that, it has been a good bet that they will do whatever they want to do.   Why stop at $1 trillion when you can do $2 trillion or $3.5 trillion?

So, they're doing $3.5 trillion.  But not really.  Because they somehow they convinced Reublicans to vote for a separate bill on infrastructure, for another $1.2 trillion.  

Now, with the above said, it does appear that a voice of reason has infiltrated the Democrat Senate.

Remember, as we discussed last month, the great macro trader and dot- connector, Stanley Druckenmiller, met with Senators to warn them against pouring more fiscal gas onto the economic fire.  He said, if he wanted to destroy the U.S. economy, this $3.5 trillion spend, into an already hot economy, is exactly what he would do.

It's a recipe for bubbles and hot inflation – both of which historically (ultimately) lead to large economic declines. And he added, "every dollar we spend now that we don't need to, won't be available in a future crisis." 

He seems have gotten to at least one Democrat Senator.  Today, Joe Manchin, the Senator from West Virginia, was singing the same tune.  He says "given the current state of the economic recovery, its simply irresponible to continue spending at levels more suited to response to a Great Depression or Great Recession, not an economy that is one the verge of overheating."   He said it would "put at risk our nation's ability to respond to the to the unforeseen crises our country could face."

That's a pretty damning public acknowledgement of the effects of a policy vote.   Somehow, though, it's safe to assume he will find a way to justify a "yes" vote.

When that happens, the last leg of the asset price boom will ensue.  Inflation will soar.  And then the Fed will start the inflation chase.  And they will likely have to gap interests rates higher to get it under control (and kill the economy in the process).  

August 10, 2021

The Senate has passed a $1.2 trillion infrastructure package.  It now goes to the house.  And the wheels are turning on a $3.5 trillion spending bill, that the democrats will ram through with a tie breaking vote by the Vice President (through the "budget reconciliation" process).  

With the spending blowout now reaching a crescendo, as we've discussed, the Fed has now fired the warnings shots on a reversal in the monetary policy path. 

Let's take a look at a couple of key charts …

Market interest rates have ripped almost a quarter point higher from the lows of last Wednesday …

You can see in the chart here, where a very well-placed comment came in from the Fed Vice Chair last Wednesday, suggesting they may be hiking rates by next year. 

As we discussed yesterday, the prospects of rising U.S. interest rates, while the rest of the world remains with the monetary policy path pointed in the opposite direction, will stoke foreign capital flows from rest of the world to the U.S. (U.S. assets). The dollar is already up 1.3% since Wednesday on the anticipation of this flow of capital. 

What area of the stock market responds the best, coming out of recession, when rates begin to turn?  Small Caps.  With blue chips stocks trading to new record highs today, you can get small caps (Russell 2000) at a 5% discount to the highs of the year. 
 

August 9, 2021

You didn't hear from me the latter part of last week, as I was down with COVID.  Thankfully, I'm recovering well and back in action today.  

Let's talk about the recent pivot from the Fed that continues to transform the theme for markets. 

We entered the year with a clearly telegraphed, massive fiscal spending agenda — and with a Fed, happy to keep the pedal-to-the-metal on monetary policy for the foreseeable future (until at least 2023).

So we are now eight months in, and the fiscal spending agenda is fully materializing.  And yet suddenly, the tune the Fed has been singing has changed.

It started with Powell's late July (post-FOMC) press conference, and continued with a well placed comment from the Fed Vice-Chair following last Wednesday's weak ADP number. 

Remember, in late July, with nearly $4.5 trillion lined up for approval on Capitol Hill, all advanced under the cover of the Fed's drumbeat that inflation is “transitory,” the Fed, conveniently, decided it’s time to explain its nuanced definition of transitory.

We heard for many months how the deflationary trend of nearly four decades, just "doesn't change on a dime" (in the words of Jay Powell).  Therefore, the drumbeat has been, that short-term inflation is simply a product of "bottlenecks" and "base effects."  Don't worry, when these supply chain disruption-related bottlenecks work out, "inflation is expected to drop back down to our longer-run goal," we were told.

Now, the in the span of two weeks, the Fed has told us that, sure prices have soared, but transitory means they just won't continue soaring at the same rate.  Slower rate-of-change, after what is tracking to be double-digit annual inflation, still means we've all been hit with a massive inflation.  And it’s forcing wages higher, which is a driver for higher inflation rates.  

Bottom line, the Fed has been doing what they do.  They've tried to manipulate expectations on inflation through their "guidance."  That doesn't necessarily have anything to do with reality.  When it's time to move, they move.  And it appears that they will be tapering into the end of the year.  And the Fed chatter has started about moving on rates next year.    

So, the Fed has pivoted.  Market interest rates are going up.

What does this represent for the global economy?  Does it represent the end of the pandemic and economic crisis?  On the latter, a change in the direction of the interest rate path in the United States, especially leading the way out of global economic crisis, will only draw capital out of global economies and into the U.S. (in search of yield and relative growth and safety). 

That especially won't bode well for emerging markets.  We've seen the movie before, following the great financial crisis.  Capital flees.  With that, if you've enjoyed the rewards of this chart, it's probably time to sell.  

August 4, 2021

It's jobs week.  The July ADP jobs report today showed 330k jobs added.  That was a big miss.  The expectation was 653k. 

The July data was supposed to be our first glimpse at what the job market looks like after half of the states have withdrawn from the federal unemployment subsidy — in effort to incentivize people to go back to work.  But the jobs number came in lower, not higher. 

Why?  The move by state governors to reject federal unemployment money was offset by more "relief" government handouts. 

Remember, the Biden administration launched the child "tax" credit last month.  That seems to have kept people at home.  And it's not going away.  Biden has proposed running it through 2025.  But as we've discussed, this is just another step toward the administrations universal income gameplan (i.e. my bet is, it's permanent).  

As we've discussed, it's not really a credit.  It's a direct payment. It’s cash.  And it's not really a "tax" credit, as those that do not pay taxes, receive and will continue to receive direct payments. 

So, this is the likely culprit for the  continued labor shortage.  And the ADP report today, telegraphs a "below expectations" government jobs report on Friday.

 
Best,

Bryan  

August 3, 2021

Earnings continue to blow away estimates.  As of Friday, with more than half of the S&P 500 reported, nearly nine out of ten companies had beaten estimates, and by an average of 85% over the estimate. 

The week has opened with more big earnings beats.  Expect more of the same.

This puts stocks back on new record highs, but the more aggressive growth in earnings simultaneously puts downward pressure on the P/E multiple on the stock market, making it cheaper even as stock prices are rising.

What about the delta variant?  The resurgence in covid doesn't appear to carry the risk of additional lockdowns.  The administration has dismissed it.  Jay Powell (last week) said the same, and added that each wave, thus far, has tended to have less economic implications.

So we should expect the economic boom to continue and the asset price boom to continue — only further bolstered by another $4.5 trillion coming down the pike from Capitol Hill.

Now, we talked yesterday about the Fed's shifty repositioning on the inflation outlook.  They now acknowledge big inflation, but dismiss any concern about it with the argument that the rate-of-change in prices, year-over-year, won't keep rising at the same aggressive pace.  That doesn't mean you and I won't be paying more and more for everything, for the foreseeable future. 

On that note, yesterday we heard from manufacturers in the ISM report.  The manufacturing index had a 14th straight month of expansion in July.  And the commentary included all of the same stuff we've heard for many months now:  strong demand, low inventories, labor shortages, supply chain reductions, rising raw material prices … have all led to higher labor costs, higher production costs and higher prices being passed along to end consumers.  There's no end in sight.  
 

Best,

Bryan  

August 2, 2021

We heard from the Fed last week, and the tune has changed

For the better part of this year, the Fed has attempted to convince the world that increasing the money supply by more than 30% over the past year, is not inflationary.

The rising prices we're seeing everyday, Powell and company, have claimed are simply the result of "base effects" and "bottlenecks."  They have said that price data only looks high because it's measured against a very low base of last year, when the economy was virtually shut down ("base effects").  And they have blamed higher prices on supply chain "bottlenecks" — which will ultimately normalize.

With the above in mind, these inflationary effects, they have claimed, are "transitory." 

 
This term started showing up in the January Fed press conference, and has since been the drumbeat from the Fed.  

Keep in mind, the term transitory was introduced AFTER about $3 trillion of fiscal stimulus was already approved and working through the economy, to such a degree that the economy was already nearing a full V-shaped recovery (by late January) — and projected by the CBO (Congressional Budget Office) to grow at a 3.7% annualized rate (hotter than pre-pandemic growth), with an unemployment rate falling to 5.3% – about right at the average unemployment rate of the past 50 years.

But in January, the new Biden administration had a huge and very expensive agenda to roll out.  It included an immediate $1.9 trillion massive spend (quickly approved).  Conveniently, the politicians on Capitol Hill justified it by citing the Fed's view that inflation wasn't a threat.   And of course, this term transitory has continued to be used by the Fed, as the Biden administration has lined up another $4.5 trillion in deficit spending (all but a done deal).

So, only now does the Fed (Powell) start to move the goal posts.  In last week's post FOMC press conference, Powell stumbled through a definition of transitory, and suggested that it means prices just won't rise at the same rate as we've seen (lower rate of change).  So, yes, he admits there is massive inflation.  But he says, the peak rate-of-change just won’t be persistent.  

 
If history is our guide, it won’t persist, because the Fed will ultimately kill it.  And when they kill it, they will kill the economy.         

It seems clear that the non-political line has been well crossed by the Fed, and they have since become an instrument of the Biden administration, to facilitate the funding of the massive economic and social change agenda.

 
As we discussed in my last note, economic declines are typically triggered by the Fed.  When the Fed finally, 1) acknowledges the hot inflation, 2) stops fueling it, 3) starts chasing it, and 4) ultimately kills it with higher interest rates, then the economic damage will come.  I think they've just acknowledged hot inflation (stage 1).  With the $4.5 trillion on the way through Congress, the next stage of withdrawing the fuel looks to be near.
 
Best,

Bryan  

July 23, 2021

Yesterday we talked about the $5.5 trillion of additional government spending that appears very likely to be dropped onto an already hot economy. 

This will follow the (unimaginably bold, at the time) $3 trillion emergency stimulus that manufactured the fastest recovery last year, from the deepest recession in modern U.S. history. 

With this, the great macro trader and dot-connector, Stanley Druckenmiller, spent time this week meeting with Senators to warn them against pouring more fiscal gas onto the economic fire.  

He rightly pointed out, with the passage of these next two spending bills, that more than half (more like two-thirds) of the money that will ultimately be spent in the name of "crisis," will have come AFTER the economy already recovered.

He says, if he wanted to destroy the U.S. economy, this is exactly what he would do:  Aggressively spend into an already hot economy.

It's a recipe for bubbles and hot inflation — both of which historically lead to large economic declines.      

He says, after the "sugar rush" wears off, and the large economic decline ensues, "every dollar we spend now that we don't need, won't be available in a future crisis." 

Druckenmiller is a common sense investor.  And this is common sense:  Blow out spending AFTER the recovery, and you not only create future crisis, but you have no ammunition to fight the crisis.

So this all affirms the inflation case we've been discussing here in my daily notes for quite sometime.  For now, we continue to ride the wave of asset prices.  But the damage will come.  First, from inflation and lower quality of life.  And then, the economic decline is typically is triggered by the Fed.  When the Fed finally, 1) acknowledges the hot inflation, 2) stops fueling it, 3) starts chasing it, and 4) ultimately kills it with higher interest rates, then the economic damage will come.

The Fed is still at stage one (i.e. the fuel will continue for quite some time). 
 

I'll be away next week, so you will not receive a note from me.
 
In the meantime, I’d like to invite you to join my premium service, The Billionaire's Portfolio.  It's a great time to join.  Our portfolio is well positioned to capitalize on the liquidity deluge that continues to build, and the themes that will drive certain sectors higher than others.  If you join now, you can listen to my most recent quarterly call (from last week), where I stepped through every stock in our portfolio, talked about the influential billionaire investor involved, and the catalysts at work, to unlock value in the stock.  You can find more information here
 
Best Regards,
Bryan  

July 22, 2021

It has been clear since the Georgia Senate run-off, that the Biden administration will get whatever spending package they want across the finish line.

With an aligned Congress, the administration has since rammed through $1.9 trillion in additional "covid relief."  Last week, Biden announced a $3.5 trillion government spending plan (with the creative label of "budget agreement"), that will again be rammed through by an aligned Congress.  And for some reason, in the face of all of this, today the Republicans appear to have agreed to do another $579 billion — for "infrastructure." 

So, here's what the spending looks like thus far …

As you can see in this graphic, there remains about $1.5 trillion unspent from existing covid relief bills.  Add another $3.5 trillion for Biden's social and environmental bill, and roughly $600 billion that the Senate is near an agreement on, and we have over $5.5 trillion to be unleashed on the economy. 

With that, let's take a look at the charts of two key industrial metals that will, no doubt, get yet another big boost from this onslaught of spending.  

Copper has corrected from record highs recently.  This is a buying opportunity.  We could see $6+ copper.  
 

Same can be said for iron ore – a buying opportunity.  It's already near all-time highs, demand is already well outstripping supply, and yet more money is coming (more demand). 
 

We own two stocks in our Billionaire's Portfolio that give us leveraged exposure to the price of both copper and iron ore.  To get the details on these stocks, join us (details here). 

Best Regards,
Bryan

July 21, 2021

Yesterday, we talked about the buying opportunity in oil and oil and gas stocks.  

Today, oil was one of the biggest movers in global markets — up 4.5%, back above $70 a barrel. 

And energy stocks were the best performers on the day in the S&P 500, up 3.5% as a sector. 

This aligns with the big outperformance of small cap value over the past two days.

As we've discussed here in my notes for the better part of last year, we should expect small caps and value to outperform large caps and growth stocks coming out of recession, and moreover, persistently outperform large caps over the next ten years

Indeed, that has been the case.  From the fourth quarter of last year, through the first quarter of this year, small cap value outperformed large cap growth by the widest margin since World War II. 

Coming out of recession, small caps tend to follow the path of interest rates (climbing rates, suggests more optimistic outlook).  With that, as interest rates (the 10-year yield) rose from as low as 31 basis points last year, to as high as 1.78% this year, small cap value stocks soared. 

And as interest rates have rolled-over the past two months, so have small caps — creating this divergence in the chart below. 

Fast forward to today:  As the fear of more restrictive policies surrounding the virus variant seems to be waning, rates are bouncing, and small caps are bouncing.  With that, the divergence in the chart above is beginning to close aggressively.  

This dynamic favors our Billionaire's Portfolio (my premium subscription service).  Our small-cap value oriented portfolio has been up as much as 30% this year, before giving back some of that outperformance over the past two months.  You can buy the portfolio on a dip by joining us today (details here). 

Best Regards,
Bryan