Please add bryan@newsletter.billionairesportfolio.com to your safe senders list or address book to ensure delivery.

October 02, 2024

Let's take a look at the behavior of copper prices the last time the Middle East was on a "knife edge," back in April of this year.
 
 
Copper is a proxy on economic activity and an essential commodity in warfare.  With that, we have a couple of drivers behind the spike in copper prices this past April/May.  And we have clear parallels with the current environment.
 
As you can see in the chart, copper prices spiked higher earlier this year on concerns that an escalation of conflict between Israel and Iran could lead to a global war.  
 
And then copper had another leg higher on optimism that Chinese stimulus measures would boost the Chinese economy, and add fuel to the global economy.  However, when that stimulus ultimately hit the market judged it as underwhelming, and copper prices sold off.
 
Fast forward to today, and we have both of these factors at play again, but with greater intensity.  And copper prices are again rising.
 
With the above in mind, take a look at this chart … 
 
 
 
This is the most recent electricity generation data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA).  It looks like it's breaking out. 
 
What signal can be taken from that?  Is it a signal on the economy (strength)?  The most obvious conclusion is the ramp in energy requirements to power generative AI  
 
And copper is critical in electricity generation and distribution.
 
We have a healthy allocation to both copper and gold producers in our Billionaire's Portfolio.  This gives us leveraged exposure to the price outlook in these key metals.  If you're not a member already, you can join us today (here), and get all of the details on these stocks.
 

 

 

 

 

Please add bryan@newsletter.billionairesportfolio.com to your safe senders list or address book to ensure delivery.

October 01, 2024

Yesterday, we talked about the upward revisions that were made on the economy by the government's Bureau of Economic Analysis (on the five-year period through this first quarter of this year).
 
It was good enough to assuage some of the concerns Jerome Powell has had on the growth data he and the Fed have made policy decisions around. 
 
With that, markets closed out the third quarter with the S&P near record highs and with tailwinds of a Fed easing cycle underway.
 
Today, we start the first day of the fourth quarter with an Iranian attack on Israel (and related global war threat escalation) and a supply disruption from a port worker strike which is compounded by already stressed logistics and supply issues from Hurricane Helene.
 
Markets went into risk aversion mode
 
Where does capital flow in times of global risk aversion?  U.S. Treasuries.  Gold.  The dollar.
 
All were up today.  Stocks were down. 
 
It started with this headline just after the market opened this morning …
 
 
Stocks did this …
 
 
So, clearly the big geopolitical risk here is that it pulls in Western allies of Israel, namely the United States, and a global war erupts.
 
That said, this risk was also contemplated back in April
 
And it happened to be right at the open of the quarter.
 
Let's revisit that timeline. 
 
Israel bombed the Iranian embassy in Syria on April 1st.  Stocks topped.   
 
Iran retaliated with strikes inside of Israel on April 13th.
 
It de-escalated on April 19th after Israel attacked targets in Iran.  Iran said it wouldn't retaliate. 
 
That was the turning point for markets, after a 7% decline in stocks, and 9% rise in gold (over 15 trading days).
 
In the current case, we should expect, at the very least, escalation from this morning's attack.  
 
That should keep markets in de-risking mode and provide more fuel for the commodities bull market.

 

 

 

 

Please add bryan@newsletter.billionairesportfolio.com to your safe senders list or address book to ensure delivery.

September 30, 2024

We heard from Jerome Powell today for the first time since the September 18th post-FOMC press conference.
 
This comes at the end of a month for stocks that started down 5% and ended up over 2%
 
And this swing was largely driven by the expectations and outcome surrounding the September Fed meeting.  
 
Remember, in that September press conference he told us exactly what he wanted to signal to markets.  He wanted the "strong move" of the 50 basis point cut, to be "a sign of [their] commitment not to get behind the curve."
 
But the cracks in the labor market clearly had the Fed worried that maybe they had indeed fallen behind (waited too long).
 
With that, Powell made it clear that a negative surprise in the labor market was the condition to cut faster. 
 
So, speed and depth of rate cuts from here is all about the employment situation.  And we get the September jobs report on Friday.
 
Let's talk about what Powell said today. 
 
He was in Nashville at the NABE (National Association for Business Economics) where he delivered some prepared remarks and did some Q&A.
 
Anything new? 
 
He was clearly more confident on the economy. 
 
Did it have anything to do with the recent stimulus measures coming out of China, and the related boost it will give to the global economy?  Probably, in part.  But there was no mention of it. 
 
What he did discuss, intentionally, was the revisions of economic growth published last Thursday by the BEA (Bureau of Economic Analysis). 
 
This report updated economic output data from the first quarter of 2019 to the first quarter of 2024.
 
It was all revised UP.
 
These revisions add another $650 billion of inflation-adjusted dollars to total output over the five year period. 
 
The report also revised personal incomes up, consumer spending up and with a higher personal savings rate — and estimated higher productivity.
 
From this report, the Fed Chair said some "downside risks" to the economy they were concerned about have been "removed."  
 

 

 

 

 

Please add bryan@newsletter.billionairesportfolio.com to your safe senders list or address book to ensure delivery.

September 26, 2024

We've talked about the outlook for a weaker dollar, driven by the recent Fed rate cut and the likelihood of a dramatic decline in U.S. real rates over the next year.
 
And as we've also discussed, a weak dollar tends to be fuel for commodities prices. 
 
Pretty much every important commodity in the world (food, energy, metals) is priced in U.S. dollars.  As such, the value of the dollar tends to have an inverse relationship with the price of commodities.  That inverse correlation gives stability to global buying power.
 
And remember, this comes as the bull cycle for commodities is young, and commodities prices still remain at historically extreme cheap levels relative to stocks.
 
Add to this, commodities have gotten another tailwind this week out of China.
 
On Monday, the Chinese central bank unveiled the most aggressive monetary stimulus since the pandemic.  It included rate cuts, support for the real estate market and direct support for the stock market
 
And then last night, the Chinese government followed that with a comprehensive plan to boost the Chinese economy.  It includes about a quarter of a trillion-dollars in fiscal stimulus.
So, this is clear big and bold action by the Chinese government to boost the economy, reverse deflationary pressures and appeal to foreign capital.
 
In a world where most major global stock markets are sitting on record highs, China becomes a "value with a catalyst" alternative.  And that catalyst, is the Chinese government explicitly supporting the stock market.
 
   
And this is liquidity that will spill over into global markets, and stimulate global growth. 
 
What commodity is the proxy on global growth?  Copper.  
 
What's the biggest mover on the week in global markets?  Copper.
 
As for commodities more broadly, China has a history of stockpiling commodities during periods of fiscal stimulus. 

 

 

 

 

Please add bryan@newsletter.billionairesportfolio.com to your safe senders list or address book to ensure delivery.

September 25, 2024

We talked about both the technical and fundamental case for a weaker dollar yesterday.  
 
The outlook for lower real interest rates is clearly dollar negative.  And it plays into the long-term dollar cycles, which are in the early stages of a bear cycle.
 
That said, the dollar ripped higher today at 10am (EST).  
 
And it was driven by the safe-haven feature of the dollar. 
 
And this was the catalyst …
 
 
Zelensky took the stage at the UN and said Russia was planning attacks on Ukraine nuclear plants.
 
Forty-five minutes later, it was reported that the head of the Israeli army said they were preparing for a ground offensive in Lebanon.   
 
And hours later, Putin was on the wires announcing that Russia is expanding "the category of states and military alliances subject to nuclear deterrence."  If they get reliable information of an attack, aided by nuclear powers (Western world military alliance), he says they reserve the right to use nuclear weapons.
 
With the above in mind, we also talked about gold prices in my note yesterday.
 
It printed another new all-time high today.  And even at record highs, the reasons to own gold continue to build:  Falling real interest rates, fiscal and monetary policy profligacy, and now the dialing up of war rhetoric, which fuels safe have demand for gold. 
 

 

 

 

 

 

Please add bryan@newsletter.billionairesportfolio.com to your safe senders list or address book to ensure delivery.

September 24, 2024

Let’s take a look at the dollar.

As we said last week, following the Fed action, the bigger 50 basis point cut was clearly dollar negative.  While the first move was up, the direction has since been down.

And as you can see in the chart, it looks like it’s breaking down technically …

And as we’ve discussed, the Fed has kept real interest rates (Fed Funds Rates minus the inflation rate) at historically high levels, and now that real rate is coming down, and has a lot of room to continue coming down before the Fed gets rates to what they consider “neutral” (neither restrictive nor stimulative to economic activity).

And the dollar tends to follow the direction of real rates.

For more perspective, let’s revisit the long-term dollar cycles, which we’ve kept an eye on throughout the history of my daily note.

Since the failure of the Bretton-Woods system through the onset of the Global Financial Crisis, the dollar traded in five distinct cycles – spanning 7.4 years on average.  And the average change in the value of the dollar (in those five cycles), from extreme to extreme was greater than 50%.

As you can see, the era of quantitative easing (QE) has seemingly distorted this last bull cycle.

The top was in late 2022, just after the Fed started QT (quantitative tightening/reversing QE). 

And now we’re in a dollar bear cycle.  And that aligns with the outlook for the bull market in commodity prices (lower dollar, higher commodities prices).  

With that, we’ve seen it reflected in gold.

We’ve often looked at this longer term chart of gold over the years, since it was trading in the $1,600s in March of 2020.  Spot gold is now closing in on this $2,700 level that we’ve been projecting from the technical analysis (Elliott Wave Theory).   

With this chart above in mind, gold tends to trade inversely to real interest rates.  And as we discussed above real rates are just beginning to decline and have a ways to continue lower.  And it happens to be as gold is already on record highs, driven by the U.S. fiscal profligacy of the past few years, global money printing, seizure of Russian assets and geopolitical risks.

So gold still has room to run. And the commodities bull cycle in general is young.  Broad commodities prices remain at historically extreme cheap levels relative to stocks.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Please add bryan@newsletter.billionairesportfolio.com to your safe senders list or address book to ensure delivery.

September 23, 2024

Remember, Jerome Powell told us last week precisely what signal he wants the market to take from the Fed's rate cut. 
 
He said, they don't think they are behind the curve, and that the Fed's "strong move" should be taken "as a sign of [their] commitment not to get behind the curve."
 
Shortly thereafter the governor of the Bank of Japan said the uncertainty around the U.S. economy is the reason for unstable markets.  And he said while soft landing in the U.S. economy remains the base case, "the data since early August has been weak, so risks have heightened somewhat."
 
Keep this all in mind as we consider the comments made by a lineup of Fed speakers since last week's meeting.
 
On Friday, Fed Governor Waller said he would support "big rate cuts" if needed.  If the labor market worsens or inflation data softens quicker, he said he's fine moving in 50s to get to "where they want to go." 
 
"Where they want to go," would be the neutral rate, which is much, much lower. 
 
So, that makes "soft inflation" a condition for him.  And not so coincidentally, he added that he sees inflation coming in soft for August, based on the inputs from the recent PPI and CPI. 
 
Atlanta Fed President Bostic had commentary focused on the labor market.  He says, "if the labor market deteriorates that is a reason for a faster pace to neutral."
 
Chicago Fed President Goolsbee said this:  "Keeping rates at decade-high does not make sense when you want things to stay where they are." 
 
That implies they want things to stay here (2%ish growth, 4.2% unemployment, and very near target on inflation).  If that's the case, the "neutral rate" is where you want to be, to neither stimulate nor restrict economic activity.  And he added, "we are 100s of basis points above the neutral rate." 
 
So, from this commentary (including the Bank of Japan) we can deduce that both the unemployment rate and the (soft) inflation rate sit on thresholds that, if breached, would prompt an aggressive reaction from the Fed. 
 
This all sounds like a Fed that knows they are behind the curve.  They held rates for too high, for too long, which has put the economy in a vulnerable position — though they don't want to admit it publicly.
 
And if we take Powell's guide on this Friday's PCE report, it should come in at 2.2%.  That would be a drop from the July reading of 2.5%.  And that means, by holding rates steady in July (for the twelfth consecutive month), the Fed actually got 30 basis points tighter (more restrictive) in the month of August (i.e. as inflation falls and the Fed Funds rate stays steady, the "real interest rate" moves higher/policy gets tighter).
 
With that, they only accomplished maybe 20 basis points of actual easing out of their policy decision last week.
 
What we do know from all of this is that the Fed wants us to believe, unequivocally, that they are on high alert to protect the economy.
 
That should serve as a perceived safety net for hiring and investing. 
 

 

 

 

 

 

Please add bryan@newsletter.billionairesportfolio.com to your safe senders list or address book to ensure delivery.

September 19, 2024

Earlier this year we talked about the parallels between the current environment and the late 90s boom. 

A technology revolution was underway in the late 90s, with the rapid adoption of the internet.  Productivity was high.  Growth was hot.  Inflation was low. And the Fed juiced it with rate cuts, starting in 1995.

The economy went on to average 4.5% quarterly annualized growth through the end of the 90s.  And stocks did this ...

  

 

Also like the current environment, the Fed had real rates (Fed Funds rate minus inflation) at historically high levels heading into the first cut. 

Greenspan cut a quarter point in July of 95, again in December, and then January.  Despite more rate tinkering throughout the period the real rate remained relatively high, as you can see in the chart below .

And as you can see in the far right of the chart, the real rate prior to yesterday’s 50 basis point cut was in the zone of that late 90s boom (i.e. at historically high levels). 

The question:  After yesterday’s move, could the Fed hold real rates here and still get a 90s-type boom-time economy, this time driven by the technology revolution of generative AI?

Growth solves a lot of problems.  But the U.S. debt/gdp has doubled since the late 90s.  And while the debt service/gbp is comparable to the late 90s period at the moment, it won’t be as they continue to refinance at high nominal rates

This debt service situation argues that the Powell Fed will have to make deeper cuts than Greenspan did in the mid-90s. 

 

 

 

 

 

Please add bryan@newsletter.billionairesportfolio.com to your safe senders list or address book to ensure delivery.

September 18, 2024

The Fed cut rates by half a point today.
 
And they project another half point cut by year end.
 
And it has everything to do with the employment situation. 
 
We've talked for months about the clear "cracks" in the labor market.  And the Fed told us back in March that unexpected weakness in the labor market was a condition for a policy response.
 
And yet they did nothing while watching the unemployment rate rise at a rate-of-change consistent with the past four recessions, and (in each case) consistent with a Fed easing cycle.
 
So they come in today, not with just a cut, but a large cut, and projecting another 50 by year end, and another 100 basis points by the end of next year.
 
What signal should the market take from this?
 
We don't have to guess.  Jerome Powell told us what signal he wants the market to take from this.  He said, they don't think they are behind the curve, and that this "strong move" should be taken "as a sign of our commitment not to get behind the curve."
 
Translation: If the job market deteriorates further, he says "we have the ability to react to that by cutting faster." 
 
So, how did markets respond?
 
It should have been stocks up, yields down, commodities up, dollar down.
 
What happened?  
 
Stocks:  Up first, then down. 
 
Yields: Down first, then up. 
 
Commodities:  Up first, then down. 
 
The dollar:  Down first, then up.  
 
This outcome for markets, by end of day, was the opposite of what you might expect for a Fed move that lightened the brake pressure on the economy, and with plenty of promises that they will do what it takes — that they are "committed to a good outcome" (i.e. stabilizing the labor market and averting an economic downturn).
 
This odd market behavior brings us back to my July 31 note, just following the Fed's last meeting. 
 
Given the Fed's reluctance to move in that July meeting, despite the obvious drag that rates were having on the economy, and the clear weakness that had developed in the labor market, I asked:  Are they not moving because they are worried about the dollar (i.e. preserving global capital flows to protect the dollar)? 
 
As we now know, the sharp unwind of the carry trade accelerated the next day, leading to a sharp drop in the dollar.  It was only stabilized by verbal (and likely actual) intervention from the Bank of Japan.
 
Today's Fed news was clearly dollar bearish. Yet, the dollar went up.
 
Are the Fed and the Bank of Japan coordinating to maintain stable markets?  Likely.    

 

 

 

 

 

Please add bryan@newsletter.billionairesportfolio.com to your safe senders list or address book to ensure delivery.

September 17, 2024

With the Fed due to officially kick off an easing cycle tomorrow they will do so well behind the curve, with the Fed Funds rate sitting 283 basis points ABOVE the rate of inflation (PCE).

But the interest rate market has already determined where rates should be.

Since Jerome Powell signaled the end of the tightening cycle in October of last year, the 10-year yield (the market determined interest rate) has fallen by 140 basis points.

Moreover, with the even sharper plunge in the 2-year yield (down 166 basis points since last October) the yield curve has returned to a positive slope, after two years of inversion.

And as we’ve discussed here in my daily notes, yield curve inversions are historically predictors of recession.

And when the curve turns positive again, it tends to indicate an economy has either entered or is about to enter recession.

That said, while market interest rates have adjusted, consumer interest rates have been slow to follow.

The average 30-year fixed mortgage rate is now at 6.2%.  If we look back at the historical spread between mortgages and the 10-year yield, it should be closer to 5.4% (or lower). 

 

Average credit cards rates are 17 percentage points above the 10-year yield.  It’s historically closer to a spread of 10. 

Auto rates?  Those are running about 300 basis points above the long run average spread to the 10-year.

Maybe these spreads will finally start narrowing when the Fed proves tomorrow that it will indeed kick off the easing cycle, after a lot of talk.