Please add bryan@newsletter.billionairesportfolio.com to your safe senders list or address book to ensure delivery.

October 05, 2023

Let's talk about the recent decline in the price of oil.  After trading above $95 a barrel last Thursday, it's now in the low $80s again.
 
This is a big reversal, countering what has been a 40% rise in crude oil prices since late June. 
 
Is this a signal of exhaustion in economic momentum?
 
Let's take a look …
 
First, if we look back at just the past eighteen months, from the date the Fed started the tightening campaign, you can see in this graphic below, the magnitude of this move in oil is not unusual.  
 
  
That said, the biggest decline in oil prices, of this past week, was yesterday.  And it came following the government's weekly petroleum report that suggested a surprising decline in U.S. gas consumption/demand
 
 
For the last week of September, the report showed a decline of 5% compared to the same period last year.
 
As you can see in the above chart, the second half of last year, also had large year-over-year declines.  And that coincided with a move in crude oil prices from $110 to $70 (chart below).  
 
  
But as we know, we can attribute plenty of this decline to the Biden administration's drawdown of the Strategic Petroleum Reserves (SPR, chart below) …
 
The difference this time:  The SPR card has been played.  Now it's time to restock.  And the Western world's war on oil has put OPEC and Russia in the driver's seat.  Not surprisingly, they have been, and will continue to hold production down.
 
With that, the inventory (supply) picture doesn't fit with the demand data, within this EIA report. 
 
Inventories have been and continue to shrink.  
 
 
As for demand, if we look at driving activity, the total vehicle miles traveled is back near pre-pandemic levels.  Is it electric vehicles that might be weighing on gasoline demand?  EVs still represent less than 1% of the cars on the road.
 
This decline in oil prices looks like a gift to buy the dip.

 

 

 

 

Please add bryan@newsletter.billionairesportfolio.com to your safe senders list or address book to ensure delivery.

October 04, 2023

We had some form intervention in the yen yesterday, following hotter than expected job openings data, as global yields and the dollar pushed higher. 
 
As we've discussed here in my daily notes, the recent history of stress events in markets have been resolved with some form of intervention (which has become commonplace in the post Fed QE era of the past 15 years).   
 
Today, the interest rate market got some relief on softer job growth data (from ADP).  That sets up for a softer jobs report on Friday, which would be another data point to keep the Fed hawks at bay. 
 
With that, stocks had a good day.
 
Add to this, the shake-up on Capitol Hill (ousting the Speaker of the House) may be a catalyst for change in the market environment
 
We came into the year expecting 1) the rate-of-change in monetary policy tightening to slow dramatically this year (it has), and 2) the rate-of-change in the fiscal policy madness to be zero (if not reversed), with a split Congress.  
 
We expected gridlock, if not a disruption of the policy path and forced fiscal sanity.  That "swing of the pendulum" is what has historically been a positive catalyst for stocks, coming out of midterm elections. 
 
We are eleven months out from the midterm election and, indeed, stocks are up (up 12% since November 8, 2021). 
 
But regarding "fiscal sanity," resulting from a split Congress, it hasn't happened.
 
Instead, the debt ceiling standoff resulted in a deal, early this past summer, that pushed out debt limit decisions to 2025, giving the Treasury license to issue unlimited debt for the next two years (through the end of the Biden first term).  And the Republican-led Congress is now on a short deadline to approve the biggest deficit spending budget in the history of the country (aside from the Covid years), in order to avoid a government shutdown.
 
But now we have change in the House. 
 
We will see if it brings action against the excesses of the past two years (from the aligned government).
 
Now, let's revisit the discussion we had on stocks last week. 
 
We looked at the analogue of September 2021. 
 
It was a bad month.  It was driven by concerns over a government shutdown, trouble in the Chinese property market, AND a Fed that had finally turned hawkish. 
 
Similarly, all of those conditions weighed on stocks in this past month of September (in the current case, including a Fed that maintained hawkish rhetoric).  And stocks were down almost 5%. 
 
A bad September in 2021 was followed by a big Q4 (up 12%). 
 
Moreover, the same can be said for 2020 and 2022.  Stocks were down almost 4% in September of 2020 and gained almost 12% in the fourth quarter.  Stocks were down over 9% in September 2022 and gained 8% in the fourth quarter. 
 
Add to all of this, we talked about the likelihood of seeing a 10% correction in stocks, in a given calendar year, based on the history of the past eighty years.  It's very likely.  We came just shy of it following the March banking system shock.  
 
This time, the 200-day moving average comes in at a 9% decline (from the July highs).  We traded just shy of that level this morning.
 
 PS:  If you know someone that might like to receive my daily notes, they can sign up by clicking below … 
 

 

 

 

 

 

Please add bryan@newsletter.billionairesportfolio.com to your safe senders list or address book to ensure delivery.

October 03, 2023

A month ago, the decline in “job openings” data (JOLTS) kicked off a week-long series of softer employment data.

It’s no secret that the Fed has been targeting/threatening jobs along the way, over the past eighteen months, in its inflation fight. 

And Jerome Powell has specifically isolated this JOLTS data.  He thinks a high supply of jobs leads to people quitting jobs at a higher rate, which leads to job seekers leveraging their position of strength to get a higher wage.

And higher wages, the Fed has feared, will lead to more inflation, and self-reinforcing inflation pressure.

So, a softer job market is considered good news in this world, as it suggests the Fed may finally relent and bring an end to the tightening cycle madness. 

Indeed, it was good enough (combined with favorable data of the past few months) to put the Fed on hold last month.

That brings us to today’s data:  This morning we kicked off the same series of jobs data with the most recent JOLTS report.  It was highera negative surprise.

This pushed yields to new sixteen-year highs, again.  Stocks went lower.  The dollar went higher.

And it triggered what looks like intervention (yet to be officially confirmed).

As we’ve discussed, this level in the benchmark U.S. market interest rate puts high stress on the domestic and global economy.

And the step higher, by the day, in U.S government bond yields, continues to stress markets that are already at vulnerable levels.

We’ve talked about the 150 level in USD/JPY, as the level of yen weakness that proved to be intolerant to the Bank of Japan last October.

The wider the spread between U.S. rates and Japanese rates, the more upward pressure on the value of the dollar vs. the yen.

They intervened last October above 150, and that event relieved pressure in global markets, turning interest rate markets (lower) and stock markets (higher).

Today, after strong JOLTS data in the U.S., the resulting dollar strength immediately spiked USDJPY above the 150 level, and then this happened …

The above is a chart of the dollar versus the yen (the line moving higher represents a stronger dollar/weaker yen and vice versa).  As we saw in October, the value of the yen was once again defended above 150 per dollar

What does the yen have to do with U.S. yields and U.S. stocks?

Remember, the central banks are working in coordination.

The Western world has been able to exit emergency level monetary policy, while simultaneously running record debt and deficits (without triggering a sovereign debt crisis), ONLY because Japan has been the shock absorber for the global economy.

The dangerous effects of Western world tightening have been subdued by keeping the liquidity pumping from a part of the world that has the most severe structural deflation problem, and the biggest government debt load in the world (Japan).  And it’s well coordinated.

Rates are still negative in Japan.

And the Bank of Japan is still in full quantitative easing (QE) mode.  In fact, they are in unlimited QE mode.

By the design of their “yield curve control” program, in order to defend the upper limit of the 10-year Japanese government bond yield they have the license to buy Japanese bonds in unlimited amounts.  Those bonds are bought with freshly printed yen, which finds its way into foreign asset markets (like U.S. Treasuries and U.S. stocks).

Now, with all of this in mind, there has been speculation that the Bank of Japan will start exiting these emergency policies by the second half of next year.  Is the world going to lose its valuable shock absorber?

With that, let’s take a look at Japan’s long, multi-decade bout with deflation.

Like their central bank counterparts, Japan has a 2% inflation target.  They’ve been above 2% now for seventeen consecutive months.

But since the early 90s, they’ve spent 90% of the time below 2%.  And for 40% of the past three decades, Japan has experienced deflation.

With that in mind, if Japan follows the lead of the Fed, which “symmetrically” targeted an “average” 2% inflation “over time,” then Japan will keep the pedal-to-the-metal on monetary policy — and continue its important role, offsetting (to a degree) the extraction of liquidity in Western world economies.

Japan can let the economy run hot for a long, long time — inflating away the world’s largest sovereign debt load. 

PS:  If you know someone that might like to receive my daily notes, they can sign up by clicking below …

 

 

 

 

 

Please add bryan@newsletter.billionairesportfolio.com to your safe senders list or address book to ensure delivery.

October 02, 2023

Friday's report on core PCE was good.  As with the broader inflation data we've seen lately, the path lower continues.  
 
The monthly change in core PCE was just +0.14%
 
That's the slowest monthly rate of change in prices in three years (since late 2020).  If we annualize the data of the past three months, the Fed's favored inflation gauge comes in just above the Fed's target of 2% (2.16%, to be precise).
 
So, that's good news.
 
How did the bond market respond.  Yields fell sharply to start the day on Friday, but reversed into the end of the day.
 
That was bad news.  
 
With that, not surprisingly, yields continued to push higher today, to open the week.  
 
And we now have the U.S. 10-year yield on 16-year highs, and this chart …
 
 
As we discussed last week, with record global government indebtedness, this level in the benchmark U.S. interest rate market puts high stress on the domestic and global economy.
 
This interest rate anchor (the U.S. 10-year yield) pulls global government bond yields higher.
 
In Europe, German 10-year yields are approaching 3%, Spanish yields near 4% and Italian yields toward 5%.  This is unsustainable territory for these weak spots in the euro zone (Spain and Italy) to service debt. With that, the future of the common currency (the euro) comes into question.  Indeed, the euro is looking vulnerable to another run toward, and below, parity versus the dollar.
 
Add to this, let's take a look at the chart of U.S. investment grade corporate debt, as a barometer of stress …  
 
 
 
As you can see, the highest volume corporate bond ETF, LQD, is trading at levels that have coincided with some form of intervention.  And that intervention, of course, in the recent history of this chart, has resulted from extreme stress and uncertainty in global financial markets (namely, disconnected government bond yields).
 
PS:  If you know someone that might like to receive my daily notes, they can sign up by clicking below …

 

 

 

 

 

Please add bryan@newsletter.billionairesportfolio.com to your safe senders list or address book to ensure delivery.

September 28, 2023

We get the Fed’s favored inflation gauge tomorrow.

As you can see in the chart below, it has been moving the right direction, but well shy of the Fed’s target of 2%.

The expectation for tomorrow’s numbers (for the month of August), is 3.9% on this year-over-year number.  On the monthly number, which Jerome Powell referenced in his recent Fed meeting, it’s expected to come in at 0.2%.  

If the year-over-year number does indeed come in below 4%, it will be the lowest since inflation peaked in February of last year (the month before the Fed started the tightening cycle).  

If the monthly change comes in at 0.2%, that would be three consecutive months at that low level, which if annualized the Fed is looking at inflation running less than 2.5%.

This is in line with the cpi data we talked about earlier in the month.

Remember, we looked at this chart …

If both core and headline inflation were to grow at around the average of the past three months (monthly rate of change), the paths would cross by the end of the year, and the core (what the Fed cares most about) would be in the mid-2s by the mid-2024, which happens to be when the market has been expecting rate cuts

Of course, the Fed tried to disabuse the market of that expectation in the communications from their September 20 meeting, by removing two rate cuts from their projections for 2024.

They want us thinking “higher rates for longer,” which is intended to suppress demand (despite the sustained disinflationary trend, driven by a crash in money supply growth).

Just like they wanted us thinking inflation was “transitory” back in 2021, which we can only assume was intended to keep the consumption fire burning (in the face of a textbook inflation boom, driven by the explosion in money supply growth).

Are they just prone to mistakes, or are they purposely managing to an outcome?

Let’s hope they aren’t manipulating toward a return of the post-GFC era of sluggish growth and ultra-low inflation, with the threat of deflation.

That would leave us with trillions-of-dollars of fiscal bullets fired, with no growth to show for it (a massive increase in debt, with no growth offset).

PS:  If you know someone that might like to receive my daily notes, they can sign up by clicking below …

 

 

 

 

 

Please add bryan@newsletter.billionairesportfolio.com to your safe senders list or address book to ensure delivery.

September 27, 2023

Yields continued to climb today.
 
With record global government indebtedness, these are high stress levels for the global economy. 
 
With that, let's revisit the events of June and October of last year.
 
In June of last year, the mere plan of the European Central Bank ending QE resulted in a blow-out of sovereign bond yields in Europe.  The global tightening cycle was just getting started, and yet Europe was already flashing warning signals of another sovereign debt crisis.  An implosion of European sovereign debt would mean an implosion of the euro (the second most widely held currency in the world), and therefore an implosion in the global economy. 
 
The ECB called an emergency meeting to plan a response.  They responded with a new plan (same as the old) to buy bonds of the weaker euro zone constituents to defend against "fragmentation" (i.e. an implosion of the euro zone).
 
That turned the interest rate market, on a dime (and bottomed global stock markets).
 
The ECB's new plan, aptly named the "Transmission Protection Instrument," was a public acknowledgement that they would rotely exit emergency level policy (raise rates, reduce the size of the balance sheet), while simultaneously manipulating markets to cancel the negative or destabilizing consequences (namely, uncomfortably high sovereign debt yields).
 
With the above in mind, the sovereign debt market in Europe has now returned to historically vulnerable levels
 
We should expect the ECB to execute on their plan.
 
Speaking of vulnerable levels, the Bank of Japan is once again looking at 150 USD/JPY.  This is the level of yen weakness, that proved to be intolerant to the Bank of Japan last October.  
 
Responsible for this yen weakness was the increasingly divergent monetary policies of Japan relative to the rest of the world (mainly, relative to the U.S.).  And related to that, by late October of last year, yields in Europe and the U.S. were trading at new highs of this tightening cycle — creating stress not only for the Japanese currency, but for the global financial system.  
 
The Bank of Japan intervened in the currency markets, to defend the value of the yen.  That relieved the pressure in markets.
 
The intervention event turned the interest rate markets (yields fell sharply) and it fueled stock market rallies. 

 

 

 

 

 

Please add bryan@newsletter.billionairesportfolio.com to your safe senders list or address book to ensure delivery.

September 26, 2023

We looked at this chart on Thursday …

The technical break-down in stocks has been driven by the pain of a sharp 25 basis point rise in the U.S. 10-year yield, in response to the Fed’s meeting last week.  That pain has spread to stock and bond markets in Asia and Europe, as well.

And you don’t have to look too hard to find bad news to compound what looks like vulnerable levels in key financial markets.

But that’s not unusual, especially in the recent history of the past 15-years — in the post-Global Financial Crisis world.

Speaking of history, let’s take a look back to late September of 2021 — two years ago.  This was another rough September, which left the S&P down 5%.

This is what stocks were doing at the time…

This chart is from my September 28, 2021 note.  The “pain” catalyst was mostly driven by a move UP in interest rates (the 10-year yield).

The Fed had turned hawkish, finally telegraphing a change in the direction of monetary policy, from easing to tightening, which is historically bad for stocks.  

Add to that, there were two other negatives weighing on stocks back in September of 2021:  1) concern about the Chinese financial system, namely a default by its biggest real estate developer, and 2) a potential U.S. government shutdown.

Sounds very familiar. 
The trendline in the 2021 chart represented the 40% climb from election day, on anticipation of a massive fiscal spend.  The break of that line turned out to be a minor technical correction, lasting a little less than a month.

Stocks rallied 12% in the fourth quarter of 2021, finishing on the highs.

Let’s turn attention back to the current chart (the first chart in this note) …

First, you’ll notice the level of the S&P 500 is right where we were two years ago (low 4300s).  So, after two years of rate hikes and (indirect and direct) demand suppression by the Fed, the global risk proxy (the S&P 500) is nearly unchanged.  

The factors weighing on stocks are similar to that of September 2021 (rising rates, a threat of government shutdown, problems in the Chinese property market). 

But now we have a Fed that is, at worst, one more rate hike away from telegraphing a change in policy direction (from tightening to easing).  At best, they are already there.

With all of the above in mind, going back through almost 80 years of data, we have a 10% decline in stocks, on average, about once a year. We’ve yet to have one this year.  If we test the 200-day moving average (the purple line in the top chart), that comes in at 9% below the July lows.  That’s just 2.3% lower than today’s close.

This puts us on the path toward Q3 earnings in a couple of weeks, where expectations have, again, been dialed down — which sets up for positive surprises. 

 

 

 

 

 

Please add bryan@newsletter.billionairesportfolio.com to your safe senders list or address book to ensure delivery.

September 25, 2023

We get the Fed's favored inflation gauge on Friday.  The August core PCE reading is expected to come in under 4% (year-over-year) for the first time in two years.  This measures the change in prices of goods and services that people have actually paid — not just a selling price. "Core," means excluding food and energy prices. 
 
So, the expectation is for a break of the 4% level.  The Fed wants to see this number at 2%.
 
What would it take to get there?  And what would it take to get there by the time the market is pricing in the probability of a first rate cut?
 
It would take an average monthly change in core PCE (month-over-month) of just under 0.17% through the first half of next year.
 
That would bring the annual change in core PCE to 2% by July.
 
This seems unlikely unless there are deflationary pressures coming down the pike.  
 
This view would argue that the Fed will probably do what they've told us they will do (i.e. raise one more time).  At this point, with a tight job market, and an economy running around a 5% annualized pace, and the expectation (of another raise) already built-in, they don't have a lot of risk in pressing the brake a bit harder.  Of course, this assumes they continue to clean up any mess that may reveal itself in the financial system, due to climbing market interest rates (i.e. intervention).
 
On that note, let's take a look at a couple of charts …
 
Here's the U.S. 10-year yield, trading above 4.5% today, and into the top of this channel …
 
 
More concerning than the level of U.S. rates, is the influence on the Euro zone interest rate market.  Today, German yields traded to the highest levels since 2011 (when the European sovereign debt crisis was escalating).  Spanish yields traded to nine-year highs.  And the chart on Italian yields looks like this (a potential breakout) …
 
 
With the above in mind, given the recent history of central bank manipulation in these markets, we should expect them to maintain control of these extremely important (to global financial stability) government bond markets.

 

 

 

 

Please add bryan@newsletter.billionairesportfolio.com to your safe senders list or address book to ensure delivery.

September 22, 2023

In late June, the four most important central bankers in the world sat on a stage in Portugal, and fielded questions spanning from the inflation outlook and rate path, to geopolitical concerns, fiscal policy, digital currencies, and AI.
 
Three central bankers on the stage, from the U.S., eurozone and UK, were all well into the process of normalizing interest rates.  And then there was the new governor of the Bank of Japan, Kazuo Ueda.
 
In my June 28th note, I called him the most important person in the room that day.  He was the only one in the room that has been trying to get inflation UP, and therefore, he was the only one in the room with negative rates and running full bore QE — buying both domestic and global assets each month with no limits
 
And running that policy, simultaneously, as the rest of the world tightened, is the only way his central bank counterparts were able to raise rates to combat inflation, without losing control of their respective government bond markets (i.e. runaway yields). 
 
How?  The Bank of Japan became the liquidity offset to the Western world's attempt to extract liquidity.  As importantly, if not more, they have been buyers of foreign government bonds (largely U.S. Treasuries) via freshly printed yen. 
 
All of this to say, perhaps the most interesting thing said that day:  Ueda said he imagined rates would go up by a large margin in Japan, "IF they GET to normalize policy."
 
With Western central banks now on pause, and holding rates "higher for longer," as they say in unison, it doesn't appear that Ueda will GET that chance any time soon.  
 
Indeed, the Bank of Japan stuck with their ultra-easy policy overnight. 
 
And they added, they will patiently continue with easing, while "nimbly responding to developments in economic activity and prices as well as financial conditions."
 
This sounds a lot like (head of the European Central Bank) Christine Lagarde's comment at Jackson Hole.  Just as everyone has been hoping the central bankers would step away from manipulating the economy and markets, Lagarde says we need even more "robust policymaking in an age of shifts and breaks."

 

"Robust policymaking" in this post-pandemic era, seems to translate into breaking things in the financial system, and then simultaneously intervening in markets to fix what they break (as the ECB did with its sovereign bond market, as the UK did with its sovereign bond market, and as the Fed did with its banking system).

 

 

 

 

Please add bryan@newsletter.billionairesportfolio.com to your safe senders list or address book to ensure delivery.

September 21, 2023

With some time to digest the message from the Fed yesterday, the 10-year yield surged and finished on the highs today.  We are now revisiting a 4.5% 10-year yield, for the first time since November of 2007.
 
With that, stocks finished on the lows of the day.  
 
And we have some charts that look concerning…  
 
 
As you can see in this chart above, this trendline from the March lows has been broken.  And this trend, importantly, was driven by a Fed response to the confidence shock in the banking system.  They stepped in to provide liquidity to depository institutions to backstop deposits.  And the bottom was in.
 
So, this line has been broken.  And we have similar charts across the stock indices (the Dow, Nasdaq) — all trend breaks.
 
With this break, the money management community piled into hedges.  The VIX spiked, albeit from very subdued levels.
 
  
 
Even oil, which has been on a tear the past three months, traded down as much as 4% from yesterday's highs.
 
This, all because the Fed projected two less rate cuts for next year?
 
Remember, many economists and much of Wall Street have been expecting recession for the better part of the past year.  Why?  The dreaded "inverted yield curve," which has historically been a predictor of recession.
 
That said, we had a technical recession, already — in anticipation of the tightening cycle. It was the first half of 2022.
 
Is the Fed hell-bent on inducing another one?  That seems to be the belief, based on the initial response from markets.
 
But remember, as Jerome Powell ended the press conference yesterday, he had this to say about the economy:
I think overall households are in good shape. Surveys are a different thing. So surveys are showing dissatisfaction, and I think a lot of that is just people hate inflation, hate it. And that causes people to say the economy is terrible, but at the same time they're spending money. Their behavior is not exactly what you would expect from the surveys. That's kind of a guess at what the answer might be. But I think there's a lot of good things happening on household balance sheets, and certainly in the labor market and with wages. The biggest wage increases having gone to relatively low-wage jobs, and now inflation coming down, you're seeing real wages, which is a good thing.
With this assessment, and an economy that is running at a near 5% annual growth rate, the Fed still seems more concerned with throttling a strong economy, rather than tipping a weak economy into recession.
 
My view:  At this point, they don't want to give the "all clear" signal to markets, which would provide fuel to markets and the economy.