Latest | Billionaire's Portfolio

March 2, 2020

Despite the increase in coronavirus cases in the U.S., stocks were up big today (as were global commodities prices).

It doesn’t hurt that the Bank of Japan came out buying Japanese stocks in record amounts last night — and likely buying other global stocks and commodities. This (explicit engagement in financial markets) is already within the monetary policy toolbox of the Bank of Japan. And as we know, the central bank in China has been in the business of supporting markets since early February. Chinese stocks were up 3% over night.

So, we have major central banks propping up financial markets. And we have chatter over the weekend of fiscal stimulus coming in Italy, and supportive “ready to act” commentary from major central bankers.

But as we discussed last week, we need major governments to come together, in coordination, on a containment strategy and a stimulus plan for the global economy. Perhaps the most fear-inducing part of the pandemic story has been the lack of trust and lack of collaboration between countries — isolationist-like behaviors, which only increases the probability of a worst-case outcome. So, collaboration and coordination are key to restore confidence.

Good news: That global “coordination” has now, to a degree, been telegraphed. An emergency call with G7 finance ministers and central banks has been scheduled to take place tomorrow.

That said, the finance ministers and central banks is important, but I suspect we need to see G7 leaders convene and draft a statement.

Remember, we didn’t see a bottom in the markets during the global financial crisis, until the G20 leaders pledged to work together to resolve “a global crisis with a global solution.” That was the turning point for global markets and for global confidence. G7 officials need to deliver a message of unity and a promise to do “whatever it takes.”

Pro Perspectives 2/28/20

February 28, 2020

Stocks rallied sharply in the last 15 minutes of trading today.

Why? Given the carnage of the past week, there has to be a decent chance that we get some policy response over the weekend — whether it be a coordinated global central bank response, or some sort of coordination from global governments to strategize on containment, and/or support the global economy with a big fiscal stimulus response.

As we discussed yesterday, the turning point for markets and global confidence during the global financial crisis, was the G20 meeting in April of 2009, when the G20 pledged to work together to resolve "a global crisis with a global solution." Markets turned well before there was any visibility on a favorable outcome for the global financial system.

With that in mind, we end the week with the world now at "highest risk" of the global spread of the coronavirus, according to World Health Organization.

Interestingly, the head of the WHO wouldn't use the word pandemic today, but he does say the "greatest enemy is not the virus itself, but it's fear, rumors and stigma."

Why? And why do governments seem to be slow to react?

It may have something to do with what they already know about pandemics.

In short, there's not much that can be done to stop it, only to mitigate the effects. Reuters had a good piece yesterday that cited a 2011 UK government white paper on pandemics.

Here are a few interesting excerpts from that white paper:

"During a pandemic, the Government will encourage those who are well to carry on with their normal daily lives for as long and as far as that is possible, whilst taking basic precautions to protect themselves from infection and lessen the risk of spreading influenza to others."

"Modelling suggests that imposing a 90% restriction on all air travel to the UK at the point a pandemic emerges would only delay the peak of a pandemic wave by one to two weeks."

"There is very limited evidence that restrictions on mass gatherings will have any significant effect on influenza virus transmission."

"There is modelling data highlighting the potential benefit of school closures in certain circumstances, both in terms of protecting individual children from infection and in reducing overall transmission of the virus in the population" … but, "The impact of closure of schools and similar settings on all sectors would have substantial economic and social consequences, and have a disproportionately large effect on health and social care because of the demographic profile of those employed in these sectors. "

Bottom line, the research determined that social and economic costs are greater with aggressive quarantines, border closures, etc. Therefore, the focus, they recommend, isn’t on trying to stop it, but is on mitigating the severity of outcomes. That seems to be the script.

Pro Perspectives 2/27/20

February 27, 2020

The bloodletting continues in global markets, with the continuation of zero visibility on containment of the coronavirus.

At today’s close, we now have a 12% decline in the S&P 500 in just six days. And the big triple-bottom in the 10-year yield has given way, trading down to 1.24% today (new record lows).

Interestingly, as global markets are getting hit. The Chinese markets, the origin of the virus, have completely recovered the losses associated with the epidemic that began unfolding in late January. Why? Intervention.

Remember, in early February, the Chinese stepped in, proactively and rolled out a number of measures to shore up the economy and markets. They have a quarter of a trillion dollars of fresh liquidity flowing through their financial system, which undoubtedly is being used to stabilize and prop up markets (among many other things).

On the “intervention” note: With the lack of prospects that this, now, global virus will be contained, policymakers need to step up with some action. It was suggested today in an WSJ Op-Ed, written by a former Fed Chair candidate, that the Fed, BOJ, ECB, BOJ and BOE step in with a coordinated rate cuts and assurance that they are ready to do more. That may help.

But higher level coordination is probably needed. We need major governments to come together, in coordination, on a containment strategy, to be accompanied by fiscal stimulus.

If we think back to the global financial crisis, the turning point for markets and global confidence, was the G20 meeting in April of 2009, when the G20 pledged to work together to resolve “a global crisis with a global solution.”

Pro Perspectives 2/26/20

February 26, 2020

With the new coronavirus cases now growing faster outside of China, we’ll likely see the true multiplicative nature of the virus over the next several days.

With that in mind, given the disruption to the global economy that will come if we do indeed have a pandemic on our hands, expect plenty of government and central bank intervention.

We’ve already seen an arsenal of measures deployed in China. Overnight, the Hong Kong government stepped in with a stimulus package, which included giving each adult resident 10,000 Hong Kong dollars. And this morning, Germany signaled the likelihood of fiscal stimulus. That had global financial markets on better footing as we entered the U.S. session this morning.

But key markets still sit on critical levels, namely the U.S. interest rate market. The 10-year government bond yield continues to hang around record lows today. Why does that matter? As we discussed yesterday, a slide lower from here (below the 2012 and 2016 lows), would be very damaging to market, business and consumer confidence.

Let’s take a look at what happened to yields and stocks during the depths of the ebola panic back in 2014. The fear about the prospects for global health were much the same as we’re seeing now. Here’s how rates and stocks responded (stocks fell about 10%).

As you can see, both had V-shaped moves, recovering before the peak in new weekly cases. In the chart below you can see the graphic of new weekly ebola cases back in 2014. The black box represents the period of decline in rates and stocks.

But clearly, with the origin of the current virus in China, the world’s manufacturer, it has a very different impact (than did Ebola) on the global economic outlook (pandemic or not). That’s where intervention comes in. Historically, major turning points in markets are associated with some sort of intervention. At this point, signs of containment should be the first signal for a bottom in markets. From that point, tailwinds of global central bank and government stimulus would serve as rocket fuel for markets. The “when” and “if”, on containment, are the big variables.

Pro Perspectives 2/25/20

February 25, 2020

We talked yesterday about the message from the interest rate market. The past two times we were here, at record lows, there was a fear of the unknown outcome for the global economy – i.e. a fear of an impending implosion of the global economy.

This means rates at a very key level. And, already, after just a couple of days of declines in stocks, we are sitting on key levels in stocks.

Let's take a look at some charts …

Today, in the face of another plunge in stocks, the 10-year yield held pretty solid, but did indeed break to new record lows, before recovering into the close. You can see the triple bottom in rates here. Interestingly, though much of the contagion fear on the coronavirus over the past two days has been directed toward an outbreak in Europe/Italy, German yields are still about 20 basis points above the record lows.

As for stocks, the S&P 500 traded into big trend line support (the yellow line) that dates back the December 2018 lows.

As for the Dow, it’s now trading below the 200-day moving average (the purple line).

For stocks this puts us 7.8% off of the highs in the S&P, and 8.4% off of the highs in the Dow.

These technical levels will be key to watch tomorrow, but the most important market to watch will be the 10-year yield. A break down in yields from here would quickly bring about the negative-rates narrative for the U.S. And that would bring out the deflationary, secular stagation pontificators. That chatter would not be good for consumer and business confidence. And confidence has been a key piece in the economic growth formula.

As we've discussed, expect global policymakers to start signaling measures to offset drags on the global economy (from supply chain disruptions, etc.).

Pro Perspectives 2/24/20

February 24, 2020

On Friday we talked about the drivers of the move in gold. Among the scenarios, we talked about the low probability scenario of the coronavirus turning into a global pandemic.

Today, that scenario continued to fuel gold and global government bond prices. And the fears of the low probability scenario becoming a higher probability scenario hit the equity markets today.

Now, a thousand point decline on the Dow doesn’t carry the significance that it would have ten years ago, given the value of the index (near 30k a week ago). But it’s still an eye opener and a headline event.

The last time we had a 1,000 point decline in the Dow was a little more than two years ago. For perspective, the concern at that time was inflation! In fact, it was fear that the bond market was telling us that inflation and interest rates were about to reset (higher!). The 10-year bond yield was trading at 2.88% at that time.

Conversely, today we have a 10-year bond yield that is testing the all-time lows.

As you can see in the chart above, the last two times we’ve been here in yields, it was on the fear of the unknown outcome (for the global economy).

In each of the prior cases, global central banks responded. Draghi effectively said, the ECB won’t let Italy and Spain default — he did the unimaginable by becoming the buyer of Spanish and Italian government bonds of last resort. And all major central banks were standing “ready to act” when the surprise Brexit vote hit in June of 2016.

The interesting thing about both the European sovereign debt crisis and Brexit is that the biggest risk that was being priced into markets was contagion (i.e. a spread of defaults, or a spread of countries opting out of the EU).

What is the risk of the coronavirus? Contagion.

With that, we have an unknown outcome from a human welfare perspective. And if we listen to those with the information and expertise, all we can do is trust that global pandemic is low risk. In a couple of weeks, we’ll know if global cases are growing by the same multiple as they’ve grown in the first month in China.

But we have a known outcome for the economy and markets. That is, global policymakers, in coordination, will throw anything and everything at it, if necessary, to keep the confidence intact, to keep markets afloat and to keep the global economy moving.

Pro Perspectives 2/21/20

February 21, 2020

As we end the week, money is aggressively moving into gold, likely driven by Chinese demand (remember, they injected a quarter of a trillion dollars into the Chinese financial system earlier this month). Likely following that money, is speculation.

Why are people speculating on higher gold prices? To hedge against three scenarios…

Here they are, from lowest probability to highest probability (in my view):

Scenario 1) – Gold is being bought for relative safety, as a hedge against the worst case outcome for the coronavirus (i.e. Pandemic).

Scenario 2) – Gold is a hedge against the inflation penalty that many believe is inevitable, following the quadrupling in size of global central bank balance sheets since 2007, and the recent return to balance sheet expansion.

Scenario 3) – Despite what may seem (on any given news day) like a scary outlook for the pandemic threat, the highest probability scenario for owning gold at this stage, is as a hedge against hotter than expected growth (by year end) that is accompanied by hotter than expected inflation (i.e. a return of inflation). Remember, we entered 2020 with the tailwinds of solid economic fundamentals, ultra-low rates, fiscal stimulus still working through the system, and resurgence of confidence following the clearance of the trade war hurdle. In this positive scenario for the economy, it’s fair to say that the Fed, in its current stance, is at risk of getting behind in the case of an upside inflation surprise. That would be positive for gold prices.

These three scenarios have varying probabilities, but all point the same direction — north for gold. On that note, we end the week with gold breaking out to seven year highs …

Pro Perspectives 2/20/20

February 20, 2020

We've talked about the Chinese central bank effect on global markets.

Among the biggest winners since China became the backstop for global markets earlier this month: the beaten down areas of the European stock market.

With that, let's revisit an excerpt from my February 10th note, where we discussed the opportunities in Spanish and Italian stocks…

"With a quarter of a trillion dollars of Chinese money undoubtedly being put to work in global markets, let's take a look at some opportunities in European stocks.

Like U.S. stocks, German stocks are on (or near) record highs. But there are very compelling laggards in Europe. Italian stocks are well off of record highs, still 44% off of the pre-global financial crisis highs. And you see in the chart below, the FTSE MIB traded today to the highest level since October of 2008.

Next, here's a look at Spanish stocks. It looks like a big breakout may be underway here too, with a break and three closes above this big trendline. This line comes in from the 2007 highs. Spanish stocks remain 38% off of those highs.

These markets have indeed been among the biggest winners for the month, and these technical lines have given way, as you can see in the updated charts below …

This continues to look like a huge opportunity to be buying the laggards in European stocks (Spain and Italy)… but only if the euro holds up.

This is a huge moment for the history of the euro. A break of this 20-year support would be ugly and bring about discussions of a return to the all-time lows. And that would likely be accompanied by draconian scenarios for the euro zone and the survival of the euro.

Pro Perspectives 2/19/20

February 19, 2020

We had another new record high for the S&P 500 today, and global markets in general were predominantly “green across the screen,” led again by commodities.

The Chinese liquidity boom continues to float all boats. And it’s probably very early on.

Below is a look at the performance of global financial markets since the PBOC rolled out the bazooka of policy measures to open the month — in an effort to counter the drag on the global economy, from a lockdown of the world’s second largest economy (China).

The performance in the above table is just from the opening of this month! Essentially, everything is up, except bonds (relatively flat) and foreign currencies. Money is flooding into dollars and dollar-denominated assets (commodities).

Remember, it was at the depths of the global financial crisis, that China came in on a buying spree of beaten-down global commodities. Is this a repeat?

Here’s what they did to crude oil during that period …

In early 2009, it looked like global demand would never come back. China stepped in and began gobbling up cheap commodities. They ran oil prices back up to more than $100.

Pro Perspectives 2/18/20

February 18, 2020

For markets, a threat like the coronavirus doesn’t have to go away for markets to move on from it. The worst case scenario (global pandemic) just has to be taken off of the table.

We’re not there yet. But as we’ve discussed over the past couple of weeks, for markets, the “unknown” about the coronavirus is being overwhelmed by the “known” of how central banks will respond.

If there is one thing we’ve learned from the events of the past decade, it’s that central banks will do, in coordination, “whatever it takes” to keep the global economy going, when faced with global crises.

In this case, central banks are responding, again, led by the PBOC.

Remember, as we’ve discussed, the elaborate measures taken by China earlier this month, to shore up the economy and financial markets, were a big deal, not just for Chinese markets but for global financial markets.

And with over a quarter of a trillion dollars injected into the Chinese financial system, we talked about the likelihood of that money being put to work, not only to stabilize global equity markets, but to start stockpiling cheap commodities again (as they did in 2010-2011).

With that, on a day where a decline in stocks were making headlines, commodities were on the rise. Palladium was up by 11%. Natural gas was up by 7%. Gold was up over 1%. Oil was up. And copper (a typical proxy on global economic sentiment) was up, not down.

With that, let’s take a look at a chart on the CRB index (the broad commodities index)…

You can see the path for broad commodities, since the PBOC rolled out their policy response (on Feb 3rd). The path has been UP.