Pro Perspectives 6/27/24

 

 

 

 

Please add bryan@newsletter.billionairesportfolio.com to your safe senders list or address book to ensure delivery.

June 27, 2024

Yesterday we talked about the potential for pain in sovereign bond markets if the government policy pendulum swings, from the globally coordinated climate agenda, to a more nationalist agenda (under leadership change) — given that trillions of dollars of deficit-funded investment in the climate agenda could be abandoned.  
 
In France, with the threat to Macron's power, French bond yields are widening against the anchor bond yield in the eurozone, the 10-year German yield (chart below). 
 
And it just so happens that the European Commission has chosen now as the right time to "rebuke" France for its fiscal profligacy.
 
The result:  Higher French bond yields. 
 
It conjures up memories of the past 15-years, when bond yields in both Italy and Spain (in 2011-2012) skyrocketed above 7% (unsustainable levels), which put two of the biggest countries in the eurozone on default watch. 
 
This memory-jostling looks to be by design of the European bureaucrats, as a shot across the bow to French voters.
 
But don't worry, any spike in French bond yields would be countered by the European Central Bank.  
 
Remember, two years ago, just weeks after announcing an end to QE, the ECB had to effectively restart it.  They had to step in and curtail rising yields in the fiscally vulnerable constituents of the euro zone, by promising to be the backstop (they are the unapologetic buyer of last resort, to preserve stability … and solvency).
 
And we should expect the Fed to behave in a similar way, if U.S. yields were to spike (on prospects of U.S. regime change).  They would be back in the QE game (managing bond yields), as they did in response to the bank shock in March of last year.  
 
With all of the above said, if these central banks were to withhold their intervention power in these scenarios, they could have significant influence on a political outcome. 
 

Pro Perspectives 6/25/24

 

 

 

 

Please add bryan@newsletter.billionairesportfolio.com to your safe senders list or address book to ensure delivery.

June 26, 2024

Let's talk about the political events ahead of us. 
 
The U.S. Presidential debate is tomorrow.  And a referendum on Macron in France comes over the weekend.
 
While the grip on power is tight, it looks possible that the global policy pendulum could swing.
 
As we know, Western world governments have highly coordinated the execution of a shared (globalist) gameplan, designed around the climate agenda.
 
Not only has this agenda necessitated the appropriation and printing of trillions and trillions of dollars to fund the transformation of global energy, but the dollars that are being printed are being devalued by the same policies.  And with that, so are the Western economies.
 
How?
 
The agreement to trade global oil in U.S. dollars (i.e. "petrodollars") has been the cornerstone of the dollar's role as the "world's reserve currency," since the end of the gold standard.  And the world reserve currency status has been key in building and sustaining the United State's position as the economic superpower.
 
So, anti-oil policies are self-inflicted threats to the wealth and sovereignty of the people executing them. 
 
That is giving way to a populist push back, that's beginning to look like Grexit, Brexit and the Trump election. 
 
The push back against the global agenda has come in Argentina, El Salvador and (somewhat) in Italy.  And the betting markets suggest it's coming in France and the United States. 
 
The question:  Will there be a government bond market shock, in response to the trillions of dollars in fiscal bullets fired for a global climate agenda that could be fractured, if not abandoned?

Pro Perspectives 6/25/24

 

 

 

 

Please add bryan@newsletter.billionairesportfolio.com to your safe senders list or address book to ensure delivery.

June 25, 2024

A retracement in Nvidia shares to the post-stock split opening of around $120 was a welcome dip for those looking to own the most important company in the world/ leading the technology revolution.
 
When Nvidia announced this split last month, we made the comparison to the 7-for-1 split of Apple stock back in 2014.  That stock too made a big runup between the day of the stock split announcement and the day of the split.  In the case of Apple, after the split, it took almost a month to make a new high.
 
Within this Apple analogue, we also talked about the post-split prospects of Nvidia's inclusion into the Dow (DJIA), which would be made possible by the lower share price (for a price-weighted index).
 
It happened in Apple nine months after the 2014 stock split.  That said, the Nasdaq outperformed the Dow over that period 2.3 to 1.
 
Now, on Friday we get the May PCE report.
 
PCE is personal consumption expenditures.  This is the inflation measure the Fed cares most about.  It's the basis of their 2% inflation target.
 
We've had clues in the recent CPI and PPI data.  Both came in with zero change in monthly prices.  And that is the consensus view on PCE (no inflation in May).  That would bring the year-over-year number down to 2.55% — a continuation of what the Fed perceives to be "a stall."
 
 
 

Pro Perspectives 6/24/24

 

 

 

 

Please add bryan@newsletter.billionairesportfolio.com to your safe senders list or address book to ensure delivery.

June 24, 2024

In my last note, we talked about this technical reversal signal in Nvidia. 
 
 
As you can see, this "outside day" has indeed predicted a reversal in the stock.  It's now down 10% from Thursday's close. 
 
And as we also discussed in my Thursday note, due to the disproportionately heavy weighting of Nvidia in the S&P 500 and Nasdaq, those key indices also put in reversal signals. 
 
With that, we discussed the prospect that these signals could trigger a (needed) rotation, and broadening of market performance.
 
With the behavior of stocks over the past three days, that seems to be developing.  To open the week the Nasdaq and S&P 500 were down, the Dow, Russell (small caps) and equal weighted S&P 500 were UP.
 
Unsurprisingly, with a rotation from expensive to cheap, the best performing sector of the day was energy. 
 
The energy sector clearly represents the best value.  It's expected to contribute almost 7% to S&P 500 earnings in Q2 (with the largest upward revision), but makes up just 3.5% of the index by market cap (as you can see in the graphic below).  And that market cap representation within the index is near historic low levels. 
 
 
 

Pro Perspectives 6/20/24

 

 

 

 

Please add bryan@newsletter.billionairesportfolio.com to your safe senders list or address book to ensure delivery.

June 20, 2024

In my last note we talked about the valuation on Nvidia. 
 
From the "Nvidia moment" in May of last year, the stock was up 3.6-fold at today's high. 
 
That said, as we've discussed, along the way the share price had actually gotten cheaper relative to its earnings power (i.e. the earnings growth has outpaced the even torrid share price growth).
 
But as we've also discussed, that dynamic has recently changed. 
 
Nvidia is no longer getting cheaper.  The quarterly earnings growth is slowing, while the share price growth has accelerated (amplified by the anticipation of and realization of the stock split).
 
And today we get what looks like the crescendo (for the moment). The stock put in a technical reversal signal (an outside day).  And unsurprisingly, with its disproportionate weighting in the major indices, the reversal in Nvidia contributed to similar signals in the S&P 500 and Nasdaq futures.  
 
Here's a look at the Nvidia chart … 
 
 
For market technicians, this is a perfect “outside day” reversal signal. This is when a new high is set in an uptrend, a buying climax, and the buying exhausts and weak speculative longs are quickly shaken out of positions forcing prices to lower lows than the prior day (closing near the lows).  A wide range (check) and significant volume (check) increase the likelihood that a trend reversal is underway. 
 
So, is this a negative signal for the broad market? 
 
Or does this signal a rotation, and broadening of market performance?
 
 
It looks like the latter. 
 
As you can see in this chart above, we've had divergence between the performance of the S&P (led by the big AI tech) and the Dow since mid-May.  Same is said for the S&P and Rusell 2000.
 
That divergence narrowed today.  
 
For some perspective on the significance of Nvidia's stock performance over the past year, and the "Nvidia moment," I want to copy in my note from May 25, 2023.  This is the day after Nvidia's game-changing Q1 earnings report last year. 
 
May 25, 2023

 

Nvidia neared the $1 trillion market cap level today.  

 

As I said yesterday, the Q1 earnings report, the incredible growth guidance for the rest of the year, and the discussion on customer demand for "re-tooling" for the generative AI transformation was a big wake-up call. 

 

Maybe the most important thing said yesterday:  The founder and CEO of Nvidia, the leading provider of technology that powers AI, said "when the ChatGPT moment came (the November 30, 2022 launch) … it helped everybody crystallize how to transition from the technology of large language models to a product and service…"  

 

That (ChatGPT) was the defining "moment" for the industry. 

 

We're just six months in. 

 

Just as the world is pondering recession, if not depression (and deflationary bust), this earnings call (the Nvidia moment) might be the defining moment for the rest of us — the moment that resets the perspective on the next decade, perhaps a boom period. 

 

The interest rate markets seem to be reorienting toward this.  The 10-year yield has risen from 3.27% to 3.60% in just two weeks. 

 

Of course, the narrative surrounding that has been "debt default."  But at the peak of the debt default frenzy, gold was on record highs.  It's now 6% lower, and falling.  The dollar is rising.  The Nasdaq just made another new high for the year.  

 

And the interest rate market has swung, over the course of one month, from pricing in an absolute certainty of rate cuts by year end, to about a coin flips chance – and, moreover, now pricing in the chance of another rate hike. 

  

 

Pro Perspectives 6/18/24

 

 
 

 

 

Please add bryan@newsletter.billionairesportfolio.com to your safe senders list or address book to ensure delivery.

June 18, 2024

A little more than twelve months ago, Nvidia shocked the world in its Q1 2023 earnings report.  Jensen Huang revealed an explosion in demand for Nvidia’s AI chips, explosive revenue and operating income growth, and eyepopping guidance for the quarters to come.

Moreover, he declared that a new technology revolution was underway.

It was the “Nvidia moment.”  And in my note that day, I said “Nvidia may be challenging Microsoft and Apple as the biggest company in the world very soon (joining the multi-trillion dollar market cap club).”

Indeed, today Nvidia surpassed both Microsoft and Apple as the largest company in the world by market cap ($3.3 trillion).

Has it gone too far, too fast?

Remember, we looked at this chart heading into Nvidia’s earnings last month.

   

The chart shows the trajectory of Nvidia’s valuation taking end of reporting quarter share price and dividing it by four times the end of reporting quarter EPS (i.e. annualized quarterly EPS).

So, we went into Nvidia earnings last month with the stock near another record high, having more than tripled since the “Nvidia moment,” but also having gotten cheaper along the way (as you can see in the chart above).

How did it get cheaper?  Not only did revenues quadruple over five quarters, but the profitability of each dollar of revenue doubled over the same period. And net income margins doubled over five quarters.

So, the stock got cheaper over the past year because earnings growth was outpacing growth in the share price.

Fast forward to today, and the stock has gone up another 42% from the levels just prior to last month’s earnings report.

Let’s take a look at what this sharp rise (primarily driven by the stock split) has done to valuation.

As we’ve discussed, quarterly revenue growth in Nvidia has been hot, but it has been declining, from 88%, to 34%, to 22%, to 18% in the most recent quarter.

The guidance for next quarter is for a much more modest 7% quarterly revenue growth.

Let’s assume they beat guidance and do the average quarterly revenue growth of the past two quarters (which would be 20% growth).

Here’s what the valuation picture looks like.

 

 

It’s no longer getting cheaper.  And if the quarterly revenue growth rate fades (which would translate into a fading EPS growth rate), the stock starts getting very expensive, despite its very important role in the new technology revolution.

 

Pro Perspectives 6/17/24

 

 
 

 

 

Please add bryan@newsletter.billionairesportfolio.com to your safe senders list or address book to ensure delivery.

June 17, 2024

The theme from the Fed’s policy meeting last Wednesday was that inflation is “still too high.”

That said, while the Fed was in session, determining that theme, inflation data was released that was “better” than “almost anybody expected.”  Those were the words of the Fed Chair himself.

If history is our guide, given that the data may have swayed some of the decision making in that meeting, with more time to digest it, it’s reasonable to expect that the Fed would line up some members to get in front of cameras and walk back on some of the hawkish tone delivered by the Fed last week.

Indeed, we’ve heard from a few already.  But surprisingly, they have held the line.

That rate outlook is leading to growing divergence between the performance of cash-rich, big-tech oligopoly stocks … and the rest (as you can see below).

 

In fact, at the worst levels this morning, the small-cap index (Russell 2000) was underperforming the S&P at the extremes of the past year.

Let’s talk about the G7 meeting that took place in Italy late last week.

The communique mentioned China 29 times.

That tops last year, where they mentioned China 20 times, which was the most since 2014.

And last year was the first time since 2019 (in the depth of the Trump trade war), that the G7 leaders said they would work toward “diversifying” supply chains, to reduce reliance on China. They addressed Taiwan, human rights, China’s ability to influence Russia, and the importance of “playing by international rules.”

China’s state-controlled media called last year’s G7 meeting, an “anti-China workshop.”

This time, within the 29 mentions, G7 leaders were more forceful and critical of China than they were in 2023.

China’s Foreign Ministry called the statements an attempt to “vilify and attack China.”

Keep in mind, the Trump administration called China “enemy number one.”

Their multi-decade economic warfare against the United States (and the West) has since expanded into hybrid warfare (economic, psychological, information, political, cyber).   Yet the Biden administration has called China, all along, just a “strategic competitor.”

Finally, just in the past year, the administration and its allies are acting as if they are tough on China, one might say provocatively so.

 

Pro Perspectives 6/13/24

 

 
 

 

 

Please add bryan@newsletter.billionairesportfolio.com to your safe senders list or address book to ensure delivery.

June 13, 2024

Yesterday’s report on consumer prices (CPI) showed no inflation in May (zero month-over-month change).  And the Fed Chair said when we see the inflation report on producer prices (PPI, which was reported this morning), “we’ll know more about what PCE will look like.”

PCE is personal consumption expenditures.  This is the inflation measure they care most about.  It’s the basis of their 2% inflation target.  And we’ll get the PCE report at the end of the month.

So again, Jerome Powell and his Fed colleagues were looking at this morning’s PPI for clues on PCE.  What did they learn?

The monthly change in core PPI was zero (no inflation).

This all aligns with the global inflation picture, which has been tracking Chinese PPI since global inflation peaked.

  
As we’ve discussed along the way, this is the equivalent of “skating to where the puck is going.”  The price of the products we will be buying in the months ahead, will be determined (in large part) by the inputs into Chinese production. 

This year-over-year change in Chinese PPI was at 26-year highs when the Fed was telling us, back in 2021, that there was no inflation.  It led on the way up (for global price pressures). 

And it has led on the way down.  Chinese PPI has now been in deflationary territory for 20 consecutive months.

This inflation view aligns with what the third largest global retailer has experienced over recent quarters.  Costco said selling prices were flat for the past two quarters.

With this inflation picture, the Fed had the opportunity to signal to the market yesterday, that they were in highly restrictive territory, and could afford to reduce restriction in the coming months if inflation continued its trajectory — just to maintain the level of restriction as inflation falls. 

This is the playbook just executed by the European Central Bank and Bank of Canada in the past week.  They laid the groundwork.  The Fed missed the opportunity.

With that, we hear from the Bank of Japan tonight.

Remember, the Bank of Japan played the critical role of global liquidity provider the past two years (the liquidity offset to the Western world’s liquidity extraction/tightening policies).

But they made the first step toward exiting that role in March. 

They raised rates, ending negative interest rates.  They ended yield curve control.  They ended ETF purchases.  And it has been reported in recent days that they may begin the end of bond purchases tonight (i.e. taper QE).

With those moves by the BOJ, in my March 19th note I said, “global central banks (led by the Fed) may now have less leeway to hold rates too high, for too long.” 

With the BOJ exiting its role as global liquidity provider, Western world central banks have to start paying closer attention to the vulnerabilities in their respective government bond markets (i.e. the risk of higher yields).

That’s why, no coincidence, two days after the Bank of Japan’s move in March, the Swiss National Bank started the easing cycle with a surprise rate cut (adding liquidity).  And we’ve since seen cuts from Sweden, Canada and the euro zone. 

Conversely, the Fed seems convinced that they can patiently sit with high real rates, until they manufacture their desired inflation rate.  The actions of their central bank counterparts tell a different story.  They don’t have the luxury.  They are all a liquidity crunch away from returning to the business of QE. 

 

 

Pro Perspectives 6/12/24

 

 

 

 

Please add bryan@newsletter.billionairesportfolio.com to your safe senders list or address book to ensure delivery.

June 12, 2024

The monthly change in the May headline inflation data reported this morning came in flat (no inflation).
 
That was a positive surprise.  Stocks rallied.  Yields fell.  The dollar fell. Commodities went up. 
 
For a Fed that's been looking for "more progress" in the decline in the inflation rate, they're getting it.  As you can see below, the core inflation rate (which excludes food and energy) has been in a very clean descent from peak levels …
 
 
 
And as we've been discussing here in my daily notes, the two hot spots in the consumer price index have been auto insurance and owners' equivalent rent.  But in May, auto insurance declined for the first time in 29 months!
 
Now, that's just a month-over-month change.  As we've discussed, it will take many more months for the year-over-year change in these two components to normalize due to the base effects of the calculation.  With that, these two components are creating the illusion that inflation is "sticky" at higher levels.
 
We've looked at where inflation would be if we stripped these two components out of the CPI.  It falls well below 2%. 
 
But a better analysis would be "normalizing" the influence auto insurance and OER have on CPI, using pre-pandemic averages.  If we do that, core CPI falls to 2.35%.  Headline CPI falls to 2.25%.  This is quite a different reality than the greater than 3% number in the reports. 
 
This simply gives us insight into whether or not the Fed is sincere, when they say inflation is "still too high."
 
Well, they said it today.  Moreover, they crafted policy ("forward guidance") around that view, by adjusting UP the end of year projection for the Fed Funds rate from 4.6% to 5.1% — which implies just one rate cut this year.
 
So, that's 125 basis point of tighter policy than the market was expecting early this year.  But as you can see in the chart below, the stock market has not been too concerned. 
 
But with stocks at record highs, perhaps the Fed IS concerned about giving the green light to markets (at this stage) to price in an easing cycle.    
 
 
 

Pro Perspectives 6/11/24

 

 

 

 

Please add bryan@newsletter.billionairesportfolio.com to your safe senders list or address book to ensure delivery.

June 11, 2024

With the May CPI report due tomorrow morning, let's revisit the two hot spots in the report.
 
As we've discussed here in my daily notes, both auto insurance and owner's equivalent rent make up about 30% of the CPI.  Both have been hot, and have been propping up the overall index, and the Fed's current restrictive interest rate policy is powerless to bring them down. 
 
Here's a visual on why …
 
 
Above is motor vehicle insurance.  This has risen at a 20% year-over-year rate for five consecutive months (the actual data is represented by the blue bars). 
 
Even if this auto insurance index were to flat-line from this point (i.e. zero month-to-month change in this insurance price index), it would still take seven months for the year-over-year measure to fall below double-digits (that scenario represented by the orange bars).
 
So, even if the insurance hikes are over, this year-over-year measure will continue to put upward pressure on the inflation data for months to come. 
 
Next is the heavier weighted component that's been propping up CPI:  Owners' Equivalent Rent (which is also influenced by the sharp rise in insurance rates).  
 
This makes up 27% of the consumer price index.  And you can see in this chart below, it has directly contributed at least 1.5 percentage points to the year-over-year change in CPI for 22 consecutive months.  The streak will likely continue in tomorrow's report.  The orange bars represent the path IF this component were to flat-line over the coming months (zero monthly change). 
 
 
This too, will continue to put upward pressure on CPI for the months ahead.
 
What does it mean?  The year-over-year computation of these two components is creating the illusion that inflation is "sticky" at higher levels.