After the market closed on Friday, Trump named Scott Bessent his nominee for Treasury Secretary.

This is good news.

He comes in as a Trump loyalist, with a clear stated interest in executing on the Trump agenda.

But he has also had plenty of influence on that agenda, and he’s talked about his own equivalent of Abenomics to turn the economy around.

His “three arrows” would aim for 1) 3% real GDP growth through deregulation, lower energy prices and giving businesses confidence to hire and invest, 2) bringing the deficit down to 3% of GDP by the end of the term, through cuts to discretionary government spending and better growth, and 3) increasing energy production by 3 million barrels (boe) a day, which will bring down overall prices.

So, it’s the 3/3/3 plan.

But much of the execution of this plan will depend on how successful he and the Trump team are in dealing with China.

As with Trump, Bessent might be “the perfect man for these times.  Not all times, perhaps not most times, but these times.”

He’s well aware/ on high alert to the vulnerable position Yellen has left the bond market in, by financing record peacetime deficit spending with short-term maturities — a third of the outstanding government debt will need to be rolled over through the next year.

And he’s a China hawk.  He understands very well that the multi-decade global imbalances that have delivered the frequent booms and busts in the global economy have to be resolved — and it’s brought to us by China’s currency manipulation.

On the latter, let’s revisit an excerpt from one of my notes during Trump’s first term (from August 2019) …

Not only does this all still apply, it’s arguably beyond the tipping point now. 

Even Bessent has openly said, this might be “the last chance to grow our way out of the [debt] problem” (the debt problem which is derived from this structural imbalance). 

On that note, currencies are the natural balancing mechanism to prevent the bubbles and global imbalances from forming.

If the yuan were freely traded, with aggressive growth in the economy over the past three decades would come a rise in the value of the yuan (rise in demand of yuan-denominated assets), making its exports more expensive.  The Chinese would consume more with a more valuable currency and richer asset values, and produce less. 

Weaker economies would have less demand for their assets, a weaker currency, and therefore more attractive exports.  They export more, consume less.  And so the cycle would go.

It all spirals down, however, when a major trading partner is deliberately manipulating its currency (keeping it cheap).  But only if its trading partners keep trading with it. 

Unfortunately, Western world politicians have kept trading with China.  They’ve done very little over the years to disrupt the spiral, for a variety of reasons (it’s politically unpalatable … constituents like cheap stuff, governments like cheap credit, and politicians like political and financial favors).

So, as with Trump 1.0, Trump 2.0 will be about dealing with China. 

Bessent has already telegraphed what he thinks will be another Plaza Accord type of “large scale globally coordinated currency, fiscal and monetary” agreement.  For it to work, it seems like it will have to involve putting China in the trade penalty box.  

As you might suspect, China’s multi-decade economic war (driven by currency manipulation), which has evolved into hybrid warfare over the past eight years (economic, psychological, biological, information, political, cyber) will likely escalate.

PS:  If you know someone that might like to receive my daily notes, they can sign up by clicking below …